On the Road: Danville, KY

Well, every March, many of us at D3hoops.com hit the road (and sometimes the air) to bring you as many games from as many places during the NCAA Tournaments as possible.

Tonight, I am sitting in a hotel on the outskirts of Morgantown, WV, having already traveled a little over three hours from Baltimore. Tomorrow, I will spend another six or so hours on the road as I make my way to Danville, KY and Centre College.

I am truly looking forward to seeing this “pod” of games at Centre. I haven’t seen any of these teams/schools during a basketball season and I will admit I kind of “volunteered” to Pat that I would make the trip (not realizing at the time it would take more than 9 hours to drive).

I am certainly familiar with most of the teams. Ohio Wesleyan was actually a school I was very seriously considering for my collegiate education (along with Wooster and Roanoke; how I got to Goucher is another, very different story). I still remember the passion many students had for the Battling Bishops, and I am sure they will be well represented this weekend. Though, in my preperation for these games, I noticed the Bishops don’t seem to do as well away from the home gym. I will interested to see if they are ready for the game Friday night against Heidelberg.

Heidelberg may have won their first OAC title, this season, but we have been talking about the team for most of the season on Hoopsville. The team has quietly been playing what seems to be very good basketball in the Great Lakes. I am looking forward to seeing if this team is for real!

Franklin ruined Defiance’s hopes of playing post-season basketball with an 11-point come-from-behind victory in the HCAC title game. Outside of that, Franklin hasn’t been a team many have been talking about. Most of the talk in the HCAC has been about Defiance – who ended up stumbling to finish the season losing two or their final three.

And Centre has certainly had the most interesting trip of the season. Losing the opener to Rust (which finding a score for normally is very difficult) and then not losing again until the SCAC title game against Millsaps. Along the way, Centre has struggled to not get down in games and has had to use late runs to win games. Millsaps should know, they had a huge lead earlier this season at Centre, only to see it disappear and lose the game in OT. Then, Millsaps has another huge lead in the SCAC title game, only to see Centre make another late run – luckily for Millsaps, the clock ran out before the lead did!

So… what in the world should I expect? I’m not going to expect anything. I can’t wait to just sit down and see what will probably be three great games of basketball. If you are in Danville this weekend, make sure you say hi! If not, enjoy the broadcasts and the blog!

NCAA Selection Shows

If you got a chance to join Pat Coleman and me for “Breakfast with Hoopsville” or “Lunch with Hoopsville”, you got to hear the exclusive announcements of the women’s tournament and the simulcast of the men’s tournament.

It was an incredible honor of mine – and for that matter the show – to have the Division III Women’s Championships Committee choose Hoopsville, after our invitation, as the place to announce the women’s teams (Sunday night) and then the brackets (Monday morning). I thank Pat Coleman for helping facilitate the invitation and then those on the committee, Shirley Egner (Chair & UW-Stevens Point Coach) and Kristin Steckmesser, for helping us get the information we needed, or even joining us on the show to answer questions.

As for the men’s show, while it was delayed, it was still incredible to see how many fans, teams, coaches, parents, etc. tune into our simulcast and then stay online as we talked about the tournament, interviewed coaches, and did our best to answer your questions. You all are very important to making Hoopsville the show that is and I thank you very much for joining us!

I would also like to thank Gary Grace, Chair of the Men’s Championships Committee, who not only agreed to call in to answer some questions on the show right after the brackets were announced, but also called a few minutes before hand to announce how the NCAA Production made a mistake with how the brackets were done and wanted to get us the correction as quickly as possible.

Now, below you will find the selection shows which we will keep up for only a few days, before removing them from the site. Take a listen and enjoy. I will be sharing a few stories from behind-the-scenes of the shows (including Sundays) in this week’s upcoming Around the Nation article.

However, there is one link I wanted to share ahead of time: enjoy the reaction of WPI when they had learned they were “dancing” in the NCAA Tournament.

[display_podcast]

Bracket reactions

I’ve been sitting here in a state of semi-consciousness for some time now, trying to decide how I’m supposed to feel about the brackets. Other than generally feeling tired.

Why is it, do we suppose, that the women’s bracket is capable of interspersing a Texas pod with a pod centered on Pennsylvania with a west coast pod and a pod centered on Ohio?

Should I be outraged that the same team is victimized by an incorrect release of the men’s bracket two years in a row? Is it important to note that last year they changed the brackets to keep conference teams from playing each other and this year they changed them to force conference teams to play each other?

Are we sure now that everyone is hosting who is supposed to?

Do we think the NCAA knows what the Thursday men’s first-round games are supposed to be about? Those are supposed to be 8/9 games and 7/10 games leading to No. 1 and No. 2 seeds, remember. I know Clarkson and John Jay do not fit that mold at all and I don’t think Capital and Bethany are seeded that close together.

The good news is that soon we start playing. Two teams will hoist Walnut and Bronze. We’re looking at the most wide-open men’s tournament since 2001, if not earlier.

So let’s have some fun. Eventually. Or we can gripe for a while if you like.

NCAA’s third regional rankings

The NCAA released its third regional rankings today. These are through games of Sunday, Feb. 24. Please note, the overall record and regional record are listed. This is not the conference record.

This is the final ranking we see. The NCAA prepares a final ranking through next Sunday’s games to use in the selection and bracketing process; however, it does not release it to the public.

Men’s basketball
In-region record, followed by overall record.

Number of teams ranked is relative to the number of teams in the region.

Atlantic Region
Team W-L Reg.
W-L
OWP OOWP
1. Richard Stockton 18-6 18-5 .511 .521
2. William Paterson 18-6 18-6 .526 .516
3. Farmingdale State 20-5 19-4 .466 .477
4. York (N.Y.) 20-8 18-7 .539 .502
5. St. Joseph’s (L.I.) 20-5 19-5 .433 .477
East Region
1. Plattsburgh State 23-2 20-0 .496 .527
2. Rochester 19-5 18-5 .595 .565
3. St. Lawrence 17-8 16-5 .555 .515
4. Brockport State 18-7 15-5 .570 .531
5. Stevens 20-5 20-5 .460 .524
Great Lakes Region
1. Hope 21-3 15-2 .508 .494
2. Capital 21-4 20-4 .528 .524
3. Wooster 22-3 15-2 .484 .490
4. Heidelberg 20-5 18-4 .519 .521
5. Penn State-Behrend 21-4 19-3 .466 .492
6. Albion 18-5 14-3 .476 .496
Middle Atlantic Region
1. Ursinus 23-2 20-1 .512 .515
2. Gettysburg 21-3 19-2 .529 .516
3. Widener 20-5 17-4 .560 .535
4. York (Pa.) 18-7 18-6 .539 .502
5. DeSales 20-5 16-4 .465 .506
6. Albright 16-7 16-6 .559 .544
7. Lycoming 16-9 13-8 .567 .554
8. Scranton 17-8 15-8 .538 .504
Midwest Region
1. Augustana 20-5 19-5 .575 .555
2. Washington U. 19-5 16-4 .647 .565
3. Lawrence 20-2 18-2 .555 .515
4. Wheaton (Ill.) 19-6 15-6 .577 .549
5. Chicago 17-7 16-7 .605 .568
6. Elmhurst 18-7 17-7 .505 .537
7. Aurora 20-5 18-5 .465 .496
8. Webster 19-5 17-5 .492 .481
Northeast Region
1. Amherst 23-2 23-1 .601 .553
2. Mass-Dartmouth 23-2 23-2 .530 .529
3. Brandeis 19-5 18-5 .610 .580
4. Worcester Tech 20-5 19-4 .535 .495
5. Bowdoin 20-5 20-5 .571 .533
6. Rhode Island College 19-6 19-6 .545 .529
7. Trinity (Conn.) 19-6 17-5 .615 .549
8. Middlebury 19-6 18-5 .596 .528
9. Emerson 22-3 21-3 .442 .499
10. Elms 19-6 17-5 .512 .483
South Region
1. Centre 23-1 18-1 .503 .498
2. Mary Hardin-Baylor 22-3 20-2 .494 .505
3. Guilford 21-4 20-4 .531 .527
4. Virginia Wesleyan 20-5 19-4 .520 .522
5. Millsaps 22-3 17-2 .476 .493
6. Maryville (Tenn.) 22-2 16-2 .451 .497
7. Randolph-Macon 20-5 15-5 .538 .527
8. Mississippi College 19-5 16-5 .507 .507
West Region
1. UW-Whitewater 21-4 19-4 .492 .540
2. St. Thomas 21-4 19-3 .499 .522
3. Occidental 20-4 13-3 .531 .527
4. UW-Stevens Point 20-5 18-5 .575 .525
5. Buena Vista 20-5 16-3 .496 .528
6. Cal Lutheran 20-4 16-4 .498 .529
7. UW-Platteville 19-6 17-5 .526 .535
8. Loras 19-6 16-4 .518 .535

Women’s basketball
In-region record, followed by overall record.

Atlantic Region
Team W-L Reg.
W-L
OWP OOWP
1. Mary Washington 22-1 23-2 .518 .527
2. William Paterson 20-5 20-5 .582 .541
3. Kean 21-3 22-3 .580 .545
4. Mount St. Mary 23-2 23-2 .537 .501
5. Marymount 20-4 21-4 .595 .523
6. New Jersey 19-5 20-5 .620 .554
Central Region
1. UW-Whitewater 21-2 23-2 .610 .557
2. UW-Eau Claire 18-4 20-5 .605 .561
3. UW-Stevens Point 20-4 21-4 .561 .547
4. Illinois Wesleyan 20-2 23-2 .468 .535
5. Washington U. 15-4 18-6 .634 .572
6. Chicago 17-5 19-5 .603 .581
East Region
1. William Smith 20-2 22-2 .553 .540
2. Rochester 17-5 19-5 .639 .575
3. St. Lawrence 17-4 21-4 .494 .540
4. Medaille 21-2 23-2 .491 .487
5. Brockport State 18-3 21-4 .507 .513
6. Cortland State 16-5 20-5 .514 .525
Great Lakes Region
1. Thomas More 20-0 25-0 .534 .505
2. DePauw 19-1 22-3 .583 .540
3. Hope 22-0 24-0 .492 .518
4. Baldwin-Wallace 23-2 23-2 .545 .537
5. Wilmington 17-6 19-6 .593 .535
6. Ohio Northern 18-6 19-6 .583 .528
Middle Atlantic Region
1. Messiah 20-2 23-2 .670 .551
2. DeSales 22-3 22-3 .577 .528
3. Scranton 18-4 19-5 .596 .529
4. Albright 18-4 20-5 .593 .551
5. Gwynedd-Mercy 19-5 20-5 .558 .500
6. Muhlenberg 19-6 19-6 .525 .506
Northeast Region
1. Tufts 22-2 22-2 .634 .571
2. Southern Maine 23-2 23-2 .558 .554
3. Amherst 22-2 23-2 .525 .560
4. Bridgewater State 20-2 20-4 .491 .530
5. Brandeis 17-6 17-7 .622 .581
6. Bowdoin 16-5 18-7 .635 .569
7. Salem State 20-3 20-5 .555 .532
8. Eastern Connecticut 21-4 21-4 .561 .551
South Region
1. Howard Payne 23-0 25-0 .536 .512
2. Oglethorpe 19-4 21-4 .570 .542
3. McMurry 22-2 22-3 .527 .512
4. Trinity (Texas) 18-4 19-5 .560 .521
5. Piedmont 18-3 22-3 .527 .500
6. Hardin-Simmons 20-5 20-5 .529 .513
West Region
1. Simpson 19-1 23-2 .553 .535
2. George Fox 15-2 22-3 .549 .517
3. Puget Sound 16-2 21-4 .516 .525
4. St. Thomas 19-6 19-6 .538 .507
5. Chapman 15-3 22-3 .538 .492
6. St. Benedict 19-5 20-5 .501 .509

Preparing for the NCAA Tournament Selections

Every season, there are plenty of questions about who may make the NCAA Tournaments and who may be left out. This year, there are a few more questions than usual thanks to the new “OWP” and “OOWP” which have replaced the “QOWI” of years pass. There are also questions about how the new strength of schedule percentages are weighted against regional records and head-to-head match ups.

This past Sunday on Hoopsville the NCAA Men’s Basketball Committee Chairman Gary Grace joined me to talk about what we can expect, what the national committee and regional committees have been dealing with and working on, and how they plan to work towards selecting the 59 men’s teams that will make the tournament and how they will be put in the bracket.

 Enjoy the interview and feel free to then post comments and questions that some of us may – or may not – be able to answer.

[display_podcast]