One Charge Too Many!

A trio of Oglethorpe women’s basketball players are joining the Insider contingent.

This season we have noticed that the amounts of charges called have significantly increased since last season. We find ourselves asking each other why is this happening? Charges used be to something a player would take pride in, seeing as there would be only a few charges called every few games. Now there are charges being called, at least for our games, every game, multiple times a game. This also makes us ask ourselves is this trend the same for men’s games? We think not! Why is it that when a girl makes an athletic move to the basket she must be out of control, yet men can do it all the time? If refs think this, then an out of position player can take a charge, or flop, which can change the whole momentum of the game. NEWS FLASH: GIRLS CAN MAKE ATHLETIC MOVES TO THE BASKET TOO! A charge used to get the bench on their feet and excited. Now a charge is just another part of the game, nothing extraordinary. A charge should be called if the player is clearly out of control and contact is made with the defensive player. Many of the charges that have been called have had no or barely any contact. The defensive player flops without even being touched. We would not be mistaken to say that 85% of the charges that have been called in our 8 games of play this year have been flops. This is just something we think should be addressed. We are not in high school anymore our games should be called this way, contact is inevitable. Sorry this is all for now. We must go to practice and practice flopping abilities seeing as that is the popular thing to do these days. Until next time, try not to miss our genius insight of the game too much!

Insider: A Look Back

The first part of the season sure has gone by fast.  It is hard to believe that I am more than a half way done with my college career.  This past semester has been filled with a lot of highs, a few lows, and a lot of twists and turns. 

This week I will briefly touch on some things that many people might not realize happens in D3 basketball.  Specifically, I will talk about our preseason commitment to the sport and some of the things we do as a program to get ready before we step on the court with coaches on October 15th.      

Most students at MIT arrive on campus a good week and a half before classes start.  We move in, help with freshman orientation, and some even participate in community service or leadership development programs. 

The end of summer is probably my favorite time of the year.  Aside from getting back together with my closest friends, there is a solid week in which I basically have no obligations.  With school, basketball, and summer internships it can be fairly hard to find some alone time to do what you please during the year so getting some time is amazing.  This year
Boston was great.  The city was lively and I had one focus in mind – get in the gym. 

I hope that every program is able to take advantage of the machine called “The Gun”.  This machine is quite a contraption that has nets to catch rebounds and an electrical throwing arm to pass to the shooter.  With this machine I was able to rattle off about 1,000-1,500 jumpers a day in about three or four hours depending on the intensity or focus of the workout. 

During these sessions I felt that I was subtly redefining myself as an individual.  I’m sure this feeling is not uncommon among athletes from all sports.  I think the biggest thing that helped me improve as a player during these workouts was the “visualization”. 

We are lucky enough to have a coach on our staff that has PhD in Sports Psychology.  Coach Oliver Eslinger (Clark ’97) talks a lot about the importance of visualizing everything we do.  Making a move as if a defender is there, imagining the footwork of a move before practicing it, and visualizing a tight release on your jumper are a few examples of the countless techniques that can be utilized.

Although a lot of players were in the gym anyway, the first day of classes signified the start of official captain’s practice.  Captain’s practice essentially takes the place of regular practice except we focus on playing, drills, and lifting.  This year we were lucky enough to have Coach Akin Aina (MIT ’96) as our Strength & Conditioning coach. 

We committed to 5 days of team plus 1 extra day of individual workout time.  It seems like 6 days a week is a lot out of season, but this type of commitment is critical in order to compete consistently at a high level.  Coach Akin developed a great strength program for us and it definitely helped us get through the tough preseason workouts.

Two reasons that I personally like the high intensity off-season workout schedule is (1) it simulates the intensity of season and (2) it separates the players that are serious about ball from the ones who think that they are serious about ball.

For conditioning we run 3 mile “bridge-loops” (run around the
Charles River crossing bridges along the way), swim, and on-court running.  Our conditioning is then tested the week before season begins.  I still claim that this test is the hardest mental and physical exertion that I have ever done for athletics.  We are required to run Harvard Stadium.  This stadium looks like a coliseum and we have to run up and down every stair in the whole stadium in under 30 minutes. 

Every year we talk it up to the freshman about how hard it is and every freshman says that the stadium is much harder than they had imagined.  I can honestly say that I will never run that Harvard Stadium after I graduate from school.

After the stadium, we rest up and fine tune our skills to get ready for the first day of practice on October 15th

We, as D3 players, really do commit to our sport year around.  It takes an enormous amount of effort but I believe that I speak for most when I say that it is more than worth it.  We find our best friends, learn how to time manage, push ourselves in new ways, meet great people from around the nation and world, and – hopefully – make a difference in others’ lives as well.

Off topic, I would like to thank the training staff at
Amherst for their efforts and help after an injury last week.  I am always amazed with how much competitors care about the welfare of opponents.  It is one of the reasons that I love this sport and the D3 community so much.  Thanks, good luck to all of those that have finals, and safe travels.

Jimmy Bartolotta

*In my next piece, I plan to recap the games from the whole first part of the season.

Top 25 News and Notes–Week 3

Chaos has attacked the Top 25 this week. On the women’s side, the voters keep trying new and different combinations of teams to make up the body of the poll, while on the men’s side there is unprecedented confusion as to who the #1 team should be.

With defending men’s champion Amherst falling at the hands of then-#3 Brandeis, which in turn had been upset by Mass.-Dartmouth earlier in the week, there was room for a new #1 in the Week 3 poll. Approximately half of the voters agreed that it should be former #2 Rochester, enough to propel the Yellow Jackets into the top slot for the third time in program history. The other twelve voters, however, could only agree that Rochester was not the top team; who the #1 team should be drew a record number of responses. Never before in the history of the men’s Top 25 poll have the voters been in such furious disagreement over the top spot, doling out #1 votes to a record seven different teams. The previous record was six, and if one restricts the analysis to regular season polls, the #1 vote has never been split more than five ways before this week. One of the #1 votes went to UW-Oshkosh, a team that received a grand total of 12 vote-points last week—the equivalent of one vote for #14, or twelve votes for #25—but scored an impressive victory over then-#6 UW-Whitewater.

On the distaff side, the top of the poll contains a number of the usual suspects, including Mary Washington, perched atop the poll for the fourth consecutive week, and longtime poll stalwarts #8 Southern Maine and #4 Messiah, members of the 81 and 78 consecutive Top 25s, respectively. In fact, seven of the teams ranked in the top nine positions have been in the Top 25 since the middle of the 2005-06 season (or longer.) But this picture changes dramatically, starting with #10 Thomas More, a member of the Top 25 for just the sixth time in program history. None of the teams ranked #10 or lower has a current stay in the Top 25 longer than five consecutive polls. Five teams in this group (those ranked #20-#24) are new to the Top 25 this week, including #20 Tufts, making its Top 25 debut.

With teams now moving into final exams and holiday breaks, the number of games drops off dramatically. It seems likely that confusion will continue to reign over the polls as we move into the new year and begin conference play in earnest.

Debutantes:
Women: #10 Thomas More is off to a 7-0 start, which includes wins over #7 DePauw and #22 Wilmington. As a result, the Saints cracked the Top 10 for the first time in program history. #20 Tufts has parlayed a 9-0 start into a first-ever berth in the Top 25. Congratulations to the Saints and the Jumbos!
Men: In the same week that Rochester ascends to the top of the poll, conference mate Case Western Reserve receives a Top 25 vote, becoming the eighth and final UAA squad to enter the all-time list of vote-getters. Congratulations to the Spartans!

Streakers:
Women: #25 Puget Sound extends their streak of Top 25 appearances to 25 weeks. Fourth-ranked Messiah receives votes in the 110th consecutive poll. Both Scranton and Wash. U. received votes, extending their perfect streaks to 128 weeks, but for the first time in poll history neither squad is in the Top 25. Calvin is also not in the Top 25, snapping a string of 18 weeks. And for the first time in 98 weeks, Bowdoin did not receive a single Top 25 vote.
Men: #18 Virginia Wesleyan fell out of the Top 10 for the first time in 22 weeks, but extended their string of voter-roll appearances to 30 weeks. #23 Wooster is a member of the Top 25 for the 80th consecutive week.

Milestones:
Women: Hope moves up to #2 this week, extending their string of Top 10 appearances to 60 weeks and marking their 120th week as a vote-getter. #12 Kean is among the vote-getters for the 25th time, while Amherst received votes for the 10th time.
Men: Third-ranked UW-Stevens Point has now received votes in 120 of the 127 men’s polls, while Nazareth is a vote-getter for the 10th time. Augustana’s #9 ranking marks the twentieth time that they have been a Top 10 team.

High-Water Marks:
Women: Sixth-ranked UW-Whitewater, Top 10 debutante Thomas More, #19 Oglethorpe, and Top 25 debutante Tufts all achieved highest-ever rankings this week. #9 McMurry matched their high mark, the fifth time they have been the ninth-ranked team in the women’s poll.
Men: In defeating the then-top ranked team, #2 Brandeis ascends to their highest-ever ranking. #16 Stevens reached a new poll high for the fifth consecutive week. Mary Hardin-Baylor repeated their #5 ranking of a week ago, matching their all-time high.

Movers and Shakers:
Women: For the second straight week, the primary movement in the women’s poll was provided by those in freefall. #5 Kean was upended by William Paterson and consequently lost 202 poll points, falling seven spots. Wash. U. suffered their third defeat, falling out of their #18 slot and shedding 171 of their 179 points. Most of the other Top 25 teams of a week ago merely bubbled up in the wake of these capsizes, with the largest gain being made by #19 Oglethorpe (+76 points/+6 places).
Men: Unbeaten UW-Oshkosh knocked off last week’s big mover, #11 UW-Whitewater, and soared into the #13 slot with a gain of 321 points. Helping to make room for the Titans were #18 Virginia Wesleyan, which dropped 192 points and 9 slots, and Keene St., which shed 216 points and fell from the #16 slot into the “others receiving votes” category.

I need an assist

I’m having a hard time deciding how to process the record set by Grinnell point guard David Arseneault. He was credited with 34 assists in the Pioneers’ 151-112 blowout of North Central (Minn.), a team barely in Division III and 1-5 against a schedule consisting primarily of bible schools and members of the UMAC, probably the worst conference in D-III.

If this were at all achieved within the normal framework of a basketball game, I’d be thrilled and you wouldn’t be reading this blog. But as you may have read on the front page, Arseneault played 38 minutes, perhaps the norm for a top-notch point guard but nowhere near normal for a System player. Here’s how much coach Dave Arseneault played his son through the first seven games: 17 minutes, 22, 19, 21, 20, 23, with 27 minutes in the most recent contest before Saturday.

Then there’s what was said afterward:

“Coming into the game we had a game plan looking to get John Grotberg a lot of points, and maybe me getting the assists record in the process while also getting Keith Chamberlain some points,” Arseneault explained. “Everything went well. At halftime we looked at the situation and said we’ll give it a further shot, and everything turned out.”

Is that what basketball is reduced to? Trying to get someone a record? Taking advantage of a bad team to get your name in the record books?

I’m not sure this is so much better than what Lincoln did to Ohio State-Marion last December, scoring 201 points.

At least those numbers are on the scoreboard, for everyone to see. Assists are a matter of rulebook interpretation, and trust me, awarding of assists vary widely.

“They were keeping track on the bench,” he said. “Sometimes when a group came on the court they’d tell me how close I was.”

And then he stayed on the floor after assist No. 27. And 28, etc. That’s what bothers me — we make a mockery of the record book, push a great performance by Robert James of Kean on March 11, 1989, onto history’s recycle bin.

March is a great time to set a record. You know it has to be in a meaningful performance, in a game that means everything.

Not a game where the goal is to run up as big a stat line as possible.

Insider: Ball at MIT

I want to start out by sending my best wishes to WashU and Sean Wallis. Sean is a tremendous athlete and person and D3 basketball is surely not the same without him. However, I know that MIT and the rest of the nation expect success for WashU and a speedy recovery for Sean.

I would also like to thank Pat Coleman for getting me involved with the Insider Team. D3hoops.com is a great site with great coverage of the basketball that we all love.

I am from Littleton, CO so coming to the east coast was somewhat of a weather and culture shock for me. In MIT talk, I’m majoring in Course 15 and Course 8. At our school all classes and majors are given a number like 18.01 (Calculus). The students, faculty, and even coaches communicate with these numbers rather than the name of the class or major. Thus, when I say that I am a Course 15 and a Course 8 major it means that I am majoring in Business Management and Physics.

Here at MIT, basketball and academics create a rather interesting dynamic. First and foremost, recruiting is one of the big issues that our coaching staff has to deal with. Unfortunately (from my perspective as an athlete) our school does not grant any slots or point systems that help kids get admitted. The application process is essentially the exact same for athletes as it is for non-athletes which ultimately makes recruiting a difficult process.

Second, overcoming the stereotypes of an MIT athlete also proves to be difficult. I was no different from many of the prospects that set foot on our campus. I thought, “How terrible, nerdy, and socially inept is this team going to be?” Initially this was more of a rhetorical question but to my pleasant surprise, the basketball team and a good portion of the school transcends that stereotype.

I have come to learn that at most D3 programs, recruits often believe that the level of play in D3 is not very competitive. I would adamantly argue that the opposite is true. Once you play against the shooters in the NESCAC or the defense in the NEWMAC you realize the extraordinary talent at this level. We play for the love of the game, the competition, and the relationships that we develop with coaches/teammates/opponents. Recruiting simply becomes a matter of how well you can express and display these great attributes to a prospect.

Lastly, adjusting to the MIT rigor is one of the hardest things to do as a student-athlete. MIT is a place that encourages communication and group efforts. I was blessed enough to meet three amazing teammates and friends at the beginning of my college career. Bradley Gampel (Miami, FL), Brandon Suarez (Tampa, FL), and Bill Johnson (
Everett, WA) quickly became like brothers on and off the court. We have had countless nights in which we have worked on Problem Sets until the sun comes up. Without that group support, school can be unbelievably overwhelming.

As you can imagine, scheduling becomes a major issue as well. At MIT it is said that a student can choose two of the four S’s and excel at them or choose three of the four and perform at an average level. Almost all students would agree that it is basically impossible to do all four of the categories. The “S” categories are Sleep, School, Social, and Sports.

I truly believe that our team is committed to including Sports as a major priority and that this attitude will be reflected by our success on the basketball court this season. I am very excited to grow and develop as the year progresses. I expect this will be a very special year for our program.

Our season has started off on a decent note. Looking forward, we have a game on Tuesday against a very solid and undefeated Emerson team. After the game I’ll be back on this column to recap the first part of the season for our team, the recent close game with #1
Amherst, and touch on some of the topics floating around the D3 basketball community.

Take care and good luck!

-Jimmy Bartolotta