Where will the pieces fall?

Today’s announcement of a new league being formed is just the first of what is likely to be many changes in conferences over the next year or so. Legislation is on the table at the upcoming NCAA convention to allow conferences to change membership without resulting in the loss of an automatic bid. (Currently, even if the members remain at seven each year, there’s a danger of losing the automatic bid if the number of consistent members from year to year falls below a certain level.)

The three MAC football expatriates, who will be playing football in the Liberty League or Centennial Conference and everything else in the “Interstate Eight” — we can call it that for now — got it started by leaving the MAC back in October, ending a period of speculation that had teams moving to the Presidents’ Athletic Conference, to the Centennial, from the Capital and the like.

Villa Julie to the CAC is a lock, just waiting to dot the I’s and cross the T’s. Hood is a natural, although the MAC is pursuing them as well. Wesley is going to be a strong CAC candidate as well, after getting turned down some years back. Frostburg State is locked into position in the AMCC until the summer, when the school will be looking for a new president, but could be a candidate, if the private schools in the league are willing to consent to take on another state school.

The MAC has to be worried. It sent out feelers to six schools and two of them must have football. Even Gallaudet, whose football program is club status, is getting looks because of that, and Misericordia has expressed an interest in adding the sport as well. Some say three schools from the Pennsylvania Athletic Conference are on the six-school list, though sources disagree on which ones aside from Misericordia.

Even the Atlantic Women’s Colleges Conference, which I had given up for dead about six months ago, seems to be breathing. The conference watched Hood and Chestnut Hill add men and saw Mary Baldwin latch up with the USA South and did nothing with its membership for more than a year, putting it in danger of losing its automatic bid (and it still could, for a year or more). But salvation might come in the form of St. Elizabeth, an all-women’s school in New Jersey, and New Rochelle, in New York. That’s a mission worth saving, and with a little more action a year ago the conference would be in better shape now.

There’s already shuffling in the Northeast, with Western New England talking about moving out of the Great Northeast Athletic Conference. The Commonwealth Coast Conference, North Atlantic Conference and GNAC could all see changes in membership since they are large enough to spawn other leagues and gobble up more automatic bids.

Beware.

In the Southeast there is talk of a new league forming involving Maryville (Tenn.), LaGrange, Piedmont, Huntingdon, Mississippi College, Louisiana College, and Oglethorpe. (Someone also told us Trinity (Texas) was looking at this league as well, but we took that with a grain of salt, as did our source.)

While we haven’t heard much rumbling from other parts of the country, the SCAC still has a stated mission of expansion on the table, after Rose-Hulman announced its pending departure for the HCAC this offseason and Austin College came in. Much of that movement could be football-related.

We’re in for an interesting few months. This “Interstate Eight” deal came together in a month or so. More will follow.

Division I teams are using us

Division III teams should not be playing Division I teams. Not as a regular season game. Not as an ‘exhibition.’ Not ever, really.

I know that this will not be a popular position, but heck, that has never stopped me before.

I know it feels good to see your team or your son on the ESPN crawl, but the D-I schools are using us. They want a live practice under true game conditions and we are giving up a game that could otherwise enhance the competition within D-III. How much do we really get out of it? You can’t really run your system. You can’t play your normal rotations. You learn nothing about how your stuff works because let’s face it, unless you are playing a horrible D-I program, they are still way better than anyone we are going to see most years.

Let’s think about this … you get to ‘play your heart out’ basically knowing that winning or losing isn’t important in the game.

Well gang, that isn’t what basketball or life are about. Yeah, it’s how you play the game and all, but in the end we do keep score in these games. We don’t say at the end of the year “Well LeTourneau plays really hard, so let’s give them a Pool C bid over Augustana.”

Some will argue that it helps D-III recruiting … ehhh I doubt it. I have heard kids say that they come because the program wins. I have heard kids say that they come because the academics are good. I have heard kids say that they come because they think they will get more playing time. I have heard kids say that they come because of a strong national travel schedule. I have never heard a kid say that he went somewhere because they play a D-I exhibition game.

Some will argue that the games bring much-needed money into poor athletic departments. Playing for the money makes us mercenaries. It’s what is wrong with the D1 game and they are making us dirty by close contact. Do you want to be seen as Marathon Oil? Because that is all you really are to the D-I program in all but the most unusual situations.

As for reputation helping the D-III program’s reputation … nope not really. Who but the most dedicated among us remember Princeton almost losing to a D-I a few years back. With all due respect, how obscure is the D-I vs. D-III record? Usually all a D-I loss signifies is that the team was Prairie View A&M or Loyola or that they had five players suspended.

We should not be letting ourselves get used this way. If it’s an exhibition, why does it count against our 25 permitted games? Why isn’t it a scrimmage? Because then the D-I could not charge admission for it or broadcast it. Face it, we are dirtier every time we associate with the ‘big boys.’

As I said at the beginning, I know that it won’t be a popular position, but let’s think about it. We are good enough without them.

NCAA holding five schools back

NCAA logoIt’s not easy to get into the NCAA or Division III. Compliance with Division III regulations is important. And with more than a dozen schools in the four-year provisional process, it seems inevitable that some might struggle.

The biggest sticking point usually is the number of sports a school offers. Division III regulations require a school to offer at least five sports in each gender, and every gender must have one sport offered in each season (fall, winter, spring). That’s where the following schools tripped up:

Maine-Presque Isle
Minnesota-Morris
Mitchell
Penn State-Berks/Lehigh Valley
Presentation

Morris is a bit of a surprise — in fact, on my recent visits to UMAC campuses, some asked me why it takes so long for a school that is already an NCAA member to move from Division II to Division III. Now it’s going to take them even longer.

Presentation, for example, appears not to have fielded an expected women’s golf or soccer team. Morris lists a women’s golf team but no 2004-05 results, while the men’s golf team similarly was silent. And I worry about some schools in the next incoming class.

The biggest losers in this? The UMAC, for sure. That’s two of their schools that will take an extra year to become eligible, setting back the conference’s timeline to get an automatic bid.

But the second-biggest loser has to be the NCAA. The random lottery to determine what order in which to allow schools in has not worked. The chair of the Division III membership committee, NYU athletic director Christopher Bledsoe, said in 2003: “We chose a lottery to select from eligible institutions because it was clear that there were more institutions interested in joining than could be accommodated at one time. This method provided for a fair way of determining which institutions were slotted in each class.”

A fair way? Hmm, perhaps, but not an efficient way. The first class featured Palm Beach Atlantic, which bailed on the Division III entry process so early they didn’t even bother to finish paperwork and were knocked back to the beginning of the process in D-II. Two others from that initial class were held back a year in this announcement. Meanwhile, Northwestern (Minn.) is clearly prepared to enter, as is St. Vincent, and they’re making them wait?

The powers that be have already realized their mistake and are considering letting a school that shows it is ready to skip a year of the four-year provisional process. But providing a more subjective entry process would have been better from the start.

NCAA Tournament changes coming

It looks like this is how the NCAA and the women’s basketball committee are planning to handle the expanded NCAA Tournament for 2005-06.

First of all, an NCAA News article refers to a field of 63, which is one team more than the maximum we’d been hearing over the past two years. The expansion, which takes effect this fall for all Division III team tournament sports, means there will be one spot for every 6.5 schools that sponsor the sport, rather than one for every 7.5. (If there are 63 women’s NCAA Tournament bids, one should expect around 60 men’s slots. There are more women’s schools than men’s schools.)

In addition, with a Wednesday opening round, there has been concern over missed class time. The women’s basketball committee proposed and the championships committee accepted the following setup (follow carefully):

There are 63 teams. Therefore, one team gets a first-round bye and does not play an opening-round game. That team will face the winner of the one Wednesday first-round game on Saturday night. All other first-round games will be played Friday night, with the winners meeting on Saturday.

Although the NCAA News does not specify, one would expect this means a return to the four-team regionals at one site, with home-court advantage thrown out the window for half of the field. The winners of those first/second-round regionals would advance to the sectionals, which would be set up similarly to previous years.

This is not a done deal. There is still another committee that must approve this before it goes into practice. It has the advantage of cutting down a day of missed class time, since teams could currently miss Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday classes if they travel for a first-round game and win to advance to the second round.

However, the unspoken caveat here is cost. Now the NCAA must pay to house three-quarters of the teams playing that first weekend instead of one-half. With four teams at one site, three must travel. It will increase travel costs and could lower gate revenue (which, granted, is small to begin with).

The championships committee also recommended the men’s basketball committee adopt this format. I, for one, hope it does not. Some of the most exciting games of the early part of the tournament are between schools evenly matched in front of a large crowd. Now, what are the chances that a 6, 7 or 8 seed would host one of these four-team regionals for the first and second round? The NCAA would be making the event less fan-friendly and more expensive to run.

St. Vincent turned down for NEC

St. Vincent was turned down for membership in the Division I Northeast Conference yesterday, according to a report in the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.

Why should you care? St. Vincent, an NAIA member which competes in the association’s Division I for basketball, has been discussed as a possible future Division III member. If so, they’d be a natural for the Presidents’ Athletic Conference.

“I think, should they decide to go Division III, we would welcome their formal application,” Joe Onderko, PAC information director, told the newspaper.

Another western Pennsylvania NAIA school, Seton Hill, is in the pipeline to enter Division III, but is making noises about either going to Division II or staying NAIA. Of course, this is the same school that objected when we ran a story on D3football.com about them entering the Division III pipeline, since they didn’t understand the Division III process. 🙂