NCAA’s second regional rankings

The NCAA released its second regional rankings today. These are through games of Sunday, Feb. 17. Please note, the overall record and regional record are listed. This is not the conference record.

Men’s basketball
In-region record, followed by overall record.

Number of teams ranked is relative to the number of teams in the region.

Atlantic
1. Richard Stockton 16-6 16-5
2. William Paterson 17-5 17-5
3. Farmingdale State 19-4 18-3
4. York (N.Y.) 19-7 17-6
5. SUNY-Old Westbury 14-9 14-7

East
1. Plattsburgh State 21-2 18-0
2. Rochester 17-5 16-5
3. Brockport State 18-6 15-4
4. Stevens 20-4 20-4
5. Nazareth 17-6 17-6

Great Lakes
1. Capital 20-3 19-3
2. Wooster 20-3 13-2
3. Hope 19-3 13-2
4. Albion 16-5 12-3
5. Penn State-Behrend 19-4 17-3
6. Heidelberg 18-5 16-4

Middle Atlantic
1. Ursinus 22-2 19-1
2. Gettysburg 19-3 17-2
3. Widener 19-4 16-3
4. DeSales 19-4 16-3
5. York (Pa.) 17-6 17-5
6. Messiah 15-8 14-7
7. Moravian 18-6 17-6
8. Lycoming 15-8 13-7

Midwest
1. Washington U. 18-4 15-3
2. Augustana 18-5 17-5
3. Lawrence 18-2 16-2
4. Chicago 15-7 14-7
5. Illinois Wesleyan 15-8 14-6
6. Wheaton (Ill.) 17-6 13-6
7. Elmhurst 17-6 16-6
8. Carroll 14-6 13-6

Northeast
1. Amherst 22-2 22-1
2. Mass-Dartmouth 21-2 21-2
3. Brandeis 18-4 17-4
4. Worcester Tech 18-5 17-4
5. Rhode Island College 18-5 18-5
6. Bowdoin 19-5 19-5
7. Trinity (Conn.) 18-6 16-5
8. Middlebury 18-6 17-5
9. Emerson 20-3 19-3
10. Bates 17-7 16-6

South
1. Centre 21-1 16-1
2. Mary Hardin-Baylor 20-3 18-2
3. Guilford 19-4 18-4
4. Virginia Wesleyan 19-5 18-4
5. Maryville (Tenn.) 21-2 15-2
6. DePauw 18-5 15-4
7. Millsaps 21-3 16-2
8. Randolph-Macon 18-5 13-5

West
1. UW-Stevens Point 19-4 17-4
2. St. Thomas 20-3 18-2
3. Occidental 19-3 12-2
4. UW-Whitewater 19-4 17-4
5. Cal Lutheran 19-3 15-3
6. Buena Vista 19-4 15-2
7. UW-Platteville 17-6 15-5
8. UW-Oshkosh 17-6 14-5

Women’s basketball
In-region record, followed by overall record.

Atlantic
1 Mary Washington 21-2 20-1
2 Marymount 20-3 19-3
3 Kean 21-2 20-2
4 William Paterson 18-5 18-5
5 Mount St. Mary (N.Y.) 21-2 21-2
6 New Jersey 18-5 17-5

Central
1 UW-Whitewater 21-2 19-2
2 UW-Eau Claire 18-5 16-4
3 UW-Stevens Point 19-4 18-4
4 Illinois Wesleyan 21-2 18-2
5 Washington U. 16-6 13-4
6 Chicago 17-5 15-5

East
1 Rochester 18-4 16-4
2 William Smith 19-2 17-2
3 St. Lawrence 19-4 15-4
4 Medaille 21-2 19-2
5 Brockport St. 20-4 17-3
6 Stevens 20-4 19-4

Great Lakes
1 Thomas More 23-0 19-0
2 Hope 22-0 20-0
3 DePauw 20-3 17-1
4 Baldwin-Wallace 21-2 21-2
5 Wilmington 18-5 16-5
6 Ohio Northern 17-6 16-6

Middle Atlantic
1 Messiah 21-2 18-2
2 DeSales 21-3 21-3
3 Albright 19-4 17-3
4 Scranton 18-5 17-4
5 Muhlenberg 18-5 18-5
6 Gwynedd-Mercy 19-5 18-5

Northeast
1 Tufts 21-2 21-2
2 Brandeis 17-5 17-4
3 Southern Maine 21-2 21-2
4 Amherst 22-2 21-2
5 Salem State 18-4 18-2
6 Bowdoin 17-7 15-5
7 Bates 15-9 15-7
8 Bridgewater State 17-4 17-2

South
1 Howard Payne 23-0 21-0
2 Oglethorpe 20-3 18-3
3 McMurry 20-3 20-2
4 Trinity (Texas) 17-5 16-4
5 Piedmont 20-3 16-3
6 Christopher Newport 18-4 17-3

West
1 Simpson 21-2 17-1
2 George Fox 20-3 13-2
3 Puget Sound 19-4 14-2
4 Chapman 22-3 15-3
5 St. Benedict 19-4 18-4
6 Gustavus Adolphus 16-7 16-7

Regional rankings

The NCAA released its first regional rankings today. These are through games of Sunday, Feb. 10. Please note, the overall record and regional record are listed. This is not the conference record.

Men’s basketball
In-region record, followed by overall record, opponents winning percentage and opponents opponents winning percentage. OWP and OOWP are calculated by D3hoops/PrestoSports
Number of teams ranked is relative to the number of teams in the region.

Atlantic Region
1. Richard Stockton 15-5 15-4 .544 .518
2. William Paterson 16-4 16-4 .516 .518
3. Farmingdale State 16-4 15-3 .462 .481
4. York (N.Y.) 17-7 15-6 .472 .495
5. St. Joseph’s (L.I.) 16-5 15-5 .415 .477

East Region
1. Rochester 17-3 16-3 .629 .573
2. Plattsburgh State 19-2 16-0 .505 .524
3. Brockport State 16-6 13-4 .585 .532
4. Stevens 19-3 17-2 .447 .532
5. Nazareth 15-5 15-5 .606 .544

Great Lakes
1. Capital 18-3 17-3 .536 .530
2. Wooster 18-3 11-2 .525 .495
3. Hope 17-3 10-2 .501 .519
4. Ohio Wesleyan 14-6 13-4 .545 .498
5. Heidelberg 16-5 14-4 .507 .528
6. Penn State-Behrend 17-4 15-3 .425 .501

Middle Atlantic Region
1. Ursinus 19-2 16-1 .526 .518
2. Gettysburg 17-3 15-2 .553 .521
3. Widener 17-4 14-3 .553 .524
4. Messiah 15-6 14-5 .650 .519
5. DeSales 17-4 14-3 .522 .507
6. Albright 14-5 14-4 .528 .544
7. York (Pa.) 16-6 16-5 .557 .506
8. Moravian 17-5 16-5 .462 .511

Midwest Region
1. Augustana 17-4 16-4 .573 .571
2. Washington U. 16-4 13-3 .690 .556
3. Lawrence 16-2 14-2 .519 .511
4. Wheaton (Ill.) 16-5 12-5 .565 .559
5. Chicago 13-7 12-7 .641 .569
6. Illinois Wesleyan 13-8 12-6 .619 .555
7. Carroll 14-5 13-5 .537 .492
8. Webster 15-5 13-5 .529 .475

Northeast Region
1. Amherst 21-2 21-1 .616 .539
2. Mass-Dartmouth 20-1 20-1 .558 .540
3. Bowdoin 18-4 18-4 .565 .529
4. Trinity (Conn.) 18-5 16-4 .610 .543
5. Middlebury 17-5 16-4 .609 .513
6. Brandeis 16-4 15-4 .583 .584
7. Worcester Tech 16-5 15-4 .548 .539
8. Rhode Island College 16-5 16-5 .537 .541
9. Emerson 18-3 17-3 .437 .511
10. Bates 15-6 14-5 .567 .540

South Region
1. Centre 20-1 15-1 .474 .497
2. Mary Hardin-Baylor 18-3 16-2 .486 .511
3. Guilford 16-4 15-4 .562 .530
4. Maryville (Tenn.) 20-2 14-2 .487 .505
5. Virginia Wesleyan 17-5 16-4 .533 .534
6. DePauw 18-4 14-3 .478 .514
7. Millsaps 19-3 14-2 .456 .492
8. Randolph-Macon 17-4 12-4 .534 .542

West Region
1. Occidental 18-3 11-1 .496 .535
2. St. Thomas 19-3 17-2 .487 .529
3. UW-Platteville 17-4 15-3 .510 .554
4. UW-Whitewater 18-3 16-3 .466 .545
5. Cal Lutheran 17-3 13-3 .504 .522
6. UW-Stevens Point 17-4 15-4 .566 .530
7. Buena Vista 18-4 14-2 .464 .543
8. Loras 17-5 14-3 .511 .547

Women’s basketball
In-region record, followed by overall record, opponents winning percentage and opponents opponents winning percentage. OWP and OOWP are calculated by D3hoops/PrestoSports
Atlantic Region
1. Kean 20-1 21-1 .561 .548
2. Mary Washington 19-0 20-1 .499 .534
3. Marymount 18-2 19-2 .587 .526
4. William Paterson 16-5 16-5 .594 .544
5. Mount St. Mary (N.Y.) 19-2 19-2 .532 .505
6. New Jersey 15-5 16-5 .631 .551

Central Region
1. UW-Whitewater 18-1 20-1 .628 .570
2. UW-Eau Claire 16-3 18-4 .594 .570
3. Washington U. 12-3 15-5 .646 .565
4. Illinois Wesleyan 16-2 19-2 .477 .534
5. Chicago 13-5 15-5 .623 .580
6. UW-Stevens Point 16-4 17-4 .548 .535

East Region
1. Rochester 15-3 17-3 .657 .577
2. William Smith 16-1 18-1 .558 .553
3. Medaille 17-2 19-2 .508 .494
4. Stevens 18-3 19-3 .475 .500
5. Brockport State 15-3 18-4 .524 .522
6. St. Lawrence 13-4 17-4 .488 .544

Great Lakes Region
1. Thomas More 18-0 21-0 .521 .514
2. Hope 18-0 20-0 .538 .528
3. DePauw 16-1 19-3 .601 .537
4. Baldwin-Wallace 19-2 19-2 .584 .538
5. Ohio Northern 15-5 16-5 .596 .527
6. Wilmington 14-5 16-5 .601 .538

Mid-Atlantic Region
1. Messiah 16-2 19-2 .665 .548
2. DeSales 19-3 19-3 .574 .533
3. Scranton 15-4 16-5 .643 .527
4. Albright 15-3 17-4 .597 .535
5. Lebanon Valley 17-3 18-3 .487 .514
6. Muhlenberg 16-5 16-5 .513 .508

Northeast Region
1. Tufts 19-2 19-2 .648 .569
2. Southern Maine 19-2 19-2 .568 .557
3. Amherst 20-2 21-2 .550 .562
4. Brandeis 15-4 15-5 .620 .580
5. Salem State 16-2 16-4 .573 .544
6. Bowdoin 15-3 17-5 .612 .560
7. Williams 15-6 16-6 .615 .570
8. Bridgewater State 16-2 16-4 .473 .527

South Region
1. Howard Payne 19-0 21-0 .575 .512
2. McMurry 18-2 18-3 .550 .515
3. Oglethorpe 17-3 18-3 .572 .549
4. Trinity (Texas) 14-4 15-5 .607 .522
5. Piedmont 14-3 18-3 .568 .502
6. Virginia Wesleyan 16-5 17-5 .530 .518

West Region
1. Simpson 15-1 19-2 .544 .538
2. George Fox 12-1 19-2 .558 .537
3. Puget Sound 13-1 18-3 .507 .544
4. Chapman 13-3 20-3 .556 .490
5. St. Benedict 16-4 17-4 .496 .514
6. St. Thomas 15-6 15-6 .536 .512

Opening night moved to Nov. 15

It’s Monday at the NCAA convention, the day in which Division III member schools vote on the various legislative proposals.

It’s not a day in which they will vote on whether to split into two divisions. We have at least another year before that happens, and perhaps more, since we’ve heard discussion that it may be delayed from its planned 2009 convention date. But there are other proposals on the docket as well that will have an impact on Division III.

The basketball season will start on Nov. 15 in 2008 and in the future after a vote that passed 248-185 with two abstentions. Currently Oct. 15 is the first date of practice but the date of the first game is subject to the calendar (the Friday before Thanksgiving). This would make it more consistent, though Opening Night would float during the week as Nov. 15 does.

This means the 2008 season will open a whole six nights earlier than usual, 12 days before Thanksgiving … and the night before Division III football’s Selection Sunday!

The usage of male practice players was restricted in women’s sports, in another key vote. It passed narrowly, 223-206 with 17 abstentions (presumably from single-gender schools). It allows use only one day a week, among other cutbacks. Practice players must be declared eligible and use a season of intercollegiate eligibility in order to participate. Only three men can be used in a basketball practice, six in soccer, three in volleyball, or half of the typical starting lineup, rounded up.

Division III members voted overwhelmingly to ban text messaging to prospective recruits. Or, more specifically, they voted to limit electronic transmission of correspondence with recruits to e-mail and faxes. So, no text messages, no Facebook/MySpace, no IMs, etc. It passed by a vote of 362-72 with two abstentions, with good turnout from Division III schools.

A proposal to allow student-athletes to work at schools’ camps passed overwhelmingly as well, 425-13 with two abstentions.

Further proposals of note got voted down, then withdrawn. A proposal to allow provisional Division III members to be counted toward meeting a league’s seven-member automatic bid requirements failed 252-185-7. This was a proposed amendment to another proposal that was then withdrawn. Another proposal, to lift the ban on new single-sport conferences, was pulled from the agenda. This primarily affects women’s ice hockey but could have a football impact as well.

It’s important to note that, while many people assume that rules in Division III come down from the NCAA national office as if engraved on stone tablets, in fact Division III schools vote on all legislation and the membership shapes the rules.

A plea for the D-III athlete

The NCAA announced that they have corrected an error in the allocation of the bids in the 2007 Division III Baseball Handbook. D3baseball.com broke the story earlier today. My role in this story was to review the much-anticipated 2007 Handbook upon its release on April 20. (After carefully following Division III sports for the past seven years, I have learned that there is much to learn about the process in the Handbook for the respective sports.)

NCAA newsThe errors in the 2007 Handbook seemed especially egregious in the original download. The list of teams seemed to be lifted from the 2005 Handbook in “cut and paste” fashion as the top line of page 32 states. Hartwick was still playing baseball. Mt. St. Vincent and Rockford were listed in two places and New Jersey City University was still an independent in the New York Region. The lists of schools did not match the tabulations. It just looked sloppy. I pointed these out to Pat Coleman and Jim Dixon. Cooler heads prevailed. The most knowledgeable D-III authority in the country and the D3baseball.com guru were able to get the information where it needed to go.

This might not be much of a story were the context of this next error not understood in the recent history of NCAA’s administering the Division III playoffs. We learned of a change in the Pool B allocations in men’s basketball in the last week of the 2006-07 regular season. When the 2007 men’s basketball brackets were released, the NCAA did not even know that Mary Hardin-Baylor and Mississippi College were in the same conference, the American Southwest Conference.

The NCAA announced that the official standard for the 2006-07 season for distance would be msn.mappoint.com “shortest distance”. There was even an administrative ruling placed in a special bulletin to university officials that “in-region” games that were contracted and scheduled under the previous standard would be honored as in-region. The new “msn.mappoint” standard allowed the ferry ride across Lake Michigan to qualify as the “shortest distance” for the men’s basketball game between Hope and Carthage to be a “200-mile” radius “in-region” game!

When the 2007 men’s basketball brackets were released, the NCAA did not even know that Mary Hardin-Baylor and Mississippi College were in the same conference, the American Southwest Conference.

However, the biggest impact of the mileage standard switch occurred in the seedings of the football playoffs. Pat Coleman noticed that the change in the official distance standard made it possible for South Region No. 7 Millsaps to be bused to No. 2 UMHB, keeping the seedings intact. Several other fans tried that same software and got the same answer. You could bus Millsaps to UMHB and send No. 5 Washington and Jefferson 20 miles into Pittsburgh to play No. 4 Carnegie Mellon in a first round game. Wow! What a bracket! The change in the standard was not considered by the football selection committee.

As a result, South Region ranked No. 3 Hardin-Simmons did not get the anticipated first round playoff game, but instead was sent to its conference rival for a first-round game. One could write a Master’s thesis on the impact of such scheduling permutations; the ASC has seen many of them.

The nature of this “rant” has changed to a sincere plea for Indianapolis to improve the quality of the support that we Division III fans get. To the NCAA: You hail “best practices” for your member institutions, yet you cannot administer a playoffs without glaring deficiencies in the processes you use. Your Handbooks have numerous mathematical and tabulation errors. You don’t even use the same format for all of the Handbooks. The 2007 Men’s Basketball Handbook 2/22/2007 revision is quite explicit in the calculation of the bids. That clarity was not present in the 2007 Baseball Handbook. The 2007 Women’s Basketball Handbook presents the conferences alphabetically, so you have to search for the other conferences in the region. In fact, the 2006 Men’s Soccer Handbook seems to be the most complete and most informative.

In the “real” world, there are major consequences for that failure to execute, yet we continually see these errors in Division III.

Your errors in Pool B for baseball were because someone responsible for the Championship in that sport did not verify the minute details. In the “real” world, there are major consequences for that failure to execute, yet we continually see these errors in Division III.

I hope that the next “self-study” that the NCAA implements will consider the poor quality of support that we are getting in Division III. I do not expect the Committee Chairs of the various committees from our respective universities to double-check these processes in the administration of the championships. You, the NCAA, have numerous customers: your member institutions, their governing boards, your student-athletes, the parents who have decided that the NCAA Division III model of “pure” amateur collegiate athletics is the correct one for the sons and daughters, and the very loyal D3 fans who contribute the campus environment. We need the NCAA to give us a better value for the services that we seek.

Why don’t you “open-source” your public data, such as the game scores, schedules, opponents’ opponents’ records, etc, to permit registered users and fans to proofread and update your data?

We sometimes wonder if the quality of support that we Division III fans receive is part of the diversity of the NCAA, i.e., all of the quality goes to Division I and Division III gets what is left. Supposedly, you “pursue excellence” and ostensibly a job with the NCAA is supposedly prestigious opportunity to work in this field.

The home page says — “The “national office” — Approximately 350 paid professionals that implement the rules and programs established by the membership. The national office staff is located primarily at the headquarters office in Indianapolis, Indiana.”

From the examples that we have seen this year, a bunch of “amateurs” have beaten the “pros.”

Final Four broadcast plans

Many already know this, but there will be live video coverage from both Salem and Springfield. We are honored to have been asked to provide the play-by-play and analysis for the NCAA’s official video broadcast of the national semifinals and third-place game.

We recommend visiting CSTV’s Web site, which will be streaming those games, and registering and testing your system now — don’t wait until game time.

CSTV’s streaming requires, unfortunately, a Windows PC. They are not Mac friendly. They also require Internet Explorer (no Firefox, Opera, etc.).

You need to be running Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 or 7.0 on the following systems in order to enjoy All-Access:

Microsoft Windows XP Home / Professional SP2, Windows XP Media Center 2005, Windows 2000 SP4; Windows Media Player 9 or 10.

We will provide our traditional audio stream of each national championship game, as always. That is accessible to Macs and PCs.

All links will also be available on our Live Audio page.

Virginia Wesleyan's Marques Fitch talks to HoopsvilleHoopsville will be airing Thursday night from Roanoke, Va., in a live show from the Wyndham Hotel starting at 8 p.m. ET. We’ll talk about the tournament so far, the Final Four games, and talk with each team as they return from the championship banquet. Come sit and listen, ask questions, point and laugh at Dave, etc.

The Wyndham is just off Exit 3 on I-581 and is the teams’ official hotel. Meet fans of other teams and just celebrate Division III basketball in general. We’ll go from 8 until at least 10, if not later, to get all four teams in.

And on Friday, whether you’re at the games or not, check out our scouting reports, which will be on the Web site during the day. We’ll also have live audio pregame coverage from Salem starting at 4 p.m. ET Friday, and Saturday’s broadcasts will start with the coaches’ roundtable in Salem and take you all the way through the postgame news conferences at both sites, including our annual audio highlight reel of the NCAA Tournament.

So fire up your browsers! It’s a long weekend of Division III on the air! And I love exclamation points, apparently!