The men’s and women’s regional rankings have both been released.

Need to know more about the regional rankings process and what they mean? Need to know more about the NCAA Tournament? Check out our NCAA Tournament FAQ.

Through games of Sunday, Feb. 17.

• First ranking
• Second ranking

The first record is in-region record, followed by overall.

• NCAA Division III men’s basketball championships handbook
  Men’s rankings
  Atlantic Region – NCAA data sheet
  1 Ramapo 19-3 21-4
  2 SUNY-Old Westbury 21-2 22-3
  3 Rutgers-Newark 18-6 19-6
  4 Richard Stockton 19-6 19-6
  5 SUNY-Purchase 20-5 20-5

  East – NCAA data sheet
  1 Rochester 20-3 21-3
  2 Cortland State 21-3 21-4
  3 Stevens 20-4 22-4
  4 Plattsburgh State 18-6 18-7
  5 Hobart 18-6 19-6
  6 Oswego State 18-7 18-7

  Great Lakes – NCAA data sheet
  1 Wooster 20-4 20-4
  2 Ohio Wesleyan 19-4 19-5
  3 St. Vincent 18-3 20-5
  4 Thomas More 20-3 21-4
  5 Capital 19-4 19-6
  6 Calvin 18-1 22-3

  Mid-Atlantic – NCAA data sheet
  1 Alvernia 21-4 21-4
  2 Catholic 19-3 22-3
  3 Albright 20-5 20-5
  4 St. Mary’s (Md.) 17-3 22-3
  5 Wesley 16-3 19-6
  6 Scranton 19-6 19-6
  7 DeSales 19-5 20-5
  8 Salisbury 15-5 18-7
  9 Franklin & Marshall 16-5 19-6

  Midwest – NCAA data sheet
  1 Illinois Wesleyan 18-3 21-3
  2 Washington U. 18-5 19-5
  3 Wheaton (Ill.) 16-5 19-5
  4 North Central (Ill.) 19-3 21-3
  5 Transylvania 18-5 19-6
  6 Rose-Hulman 21-3 22-3
  7 St. Norbert 18-5 18-5
  8 Augustana 16-7 17-7

  Northeast – NCAA data sheet
  1 Amherst 23-2 23-2
  2 WPI 23-2 23-2
  3 Williams 20-3 22-3
  4 Rhode Island College 22-3 22-3
  5 Middlebury 19-2 22-2
  6 MIT 19-4 20-4
  7 Springfield 18-7 18-7
  8 Brandeis 17-7 17-7
  9 Curry 18-7 18-7
  10 Westfield State 19-4 21-4
  11 Eastern Connecticut 18-4 18-7
  12 Tufts 16-5 17-8

  South – NCAA data sheet
  1 Virginia Wesleyan 16-5 19-6
  2 Hampden-Sydney 18-3 22-3
  3 Mary Hardin-Baylor 21-4 21-4
  4 Christopher Newport 17-5 18-5
  5 Emory 17-6 17-6
  6 Concordia (Texas) 18-4 20-5
  7 Texas-Dallas 19-6 19-6
  8 Randolph 14-5 20-5

  West – NCAA data sheet
  1 St. Thomas 24-1 24-1
  2 UW-Stevens Point 21-4 21-4
  3 UW-Whitewater 20-4 21-4
  4 Whitworth 21-3 22-3
  5 Buena Vista 18-6 19-6
  6 UW-Stout 18-6 19-6
  7 Concordia-Moorhead 18-6 18-7
  8 Augsburg 19-6 19-6
  9 Whitman 15-6 18-7

  Regional score reporting forms (including SOS) below:
  Atlantic | East | Great Lakes | Middle Atlantic | Midwest | Northeast | South | West

  Women’s
  Atlantic – NCAA data sheet
  1 Montclair State 25-0 25-0
  2 Catholic 21-1 24-1
  3 Baruch 23-2 24-2
  4 Marymount 19-4 21-4
  5 William Paterson 18-6 19-6
  6 Mary Washington 17-6 19-6
  7 York (Pa.) 15-6 19-6
  8 TCNJ 17-8 18-8

  Central – NCAA data sheet
  1 Cornell 22-1 22-1
  2 UW-Whitewater 18-4 20-5
  3 Washington U. 18-4 19-5
  4 Carthage 18-4 20-4
  5 UW-Oshkosh 17-5 20-5
  6 Illinois Wesleyan 15-5 17-7
  7 Monmouth 18-4 19-4
  8 UW-Stevens Point 19-5 20-5

  East – NCAA data sheet
  1 Ithaca 21-2 23-2
  2 Rochester 19-5 19-5
  3 New Paltz State 22-3 22-3
  4 Geneseo State 18-6 19-6
  5 Vassar 19-4 21-4
  6 Oswego State 17-7 17-8
  7 St. Lawrence 16-8 17-8
  8 Hartwick 15-6 18-7

  Great Lakes – NCAA data sheet
  1 Ohio Northern 23-0 24-1
  2 DePauw 19-0 25-0
  3 Hope 21-1 24-1
  4 Calvin 18-1 22-2
  5 Thomas More 24-1 24-1
  6 La Roche 21-2 22-2
  7 Otterbein 19-5 20-5
  8 Franklin 19-4 21-4

  Mid-Atlantic – NCAA data sheet
  1 Messiah 20-2 22-3
  2 Widener 20-4 21-4
  3 Moravian 19-5 20-5
  4 Scranton 17-6 18-7
  5 FDU-Florham 21-3 22-3
  6 Swarthmore 18-5 19-6
  7 Lebanon Valley 21-4 21-4
  8 (King’s) 19-5 20-5
  Although the NCAA posting left this last spot blank, we believe this is King’s.

  Northeast – NCAA data sheet
  1 Amherst 23-1 24-1
  2 Tufts 22-2 23-2
  3 Babson 22-1 23-2
  4 Southern Maine 22-1 24-1
  5 Bridgewater State 21-3 21-3
  6 Williams 20-4 21-4
  7 Smith 22-3 22-3
  8 Castleton State 23-1 24-1
  9 University of New England 21-4 21-4
  10 Emmanuel 20-3 20-5

  South – NCAA data sheet
  1 Ferrum 22-3 22-3
  2 Christopher Newport 22-2 23-2
  3 Louisiana College 20-3 21-3
  4 Maryville (Tenn.) 22-3 22-3
  5 Eastern Mennonite 17-3 19-5
  6 Howard Payne 21-4 21-4
  7 Trinity (Texas) 21-4 21-4
  8 Emory 21-3 21-3

  West – NCAA data sheet
  1 Simpson 19-1 23-2
  2 Lewis and Clark 19-2 23-2
  3 St. Thomas 20-4 20-5
  4 Concordia-Moorhead 20-4 20-5
  5 Cal Lutheran 18-4 21-4
  6 Whitman 16-3 20-4
  7 Chapman 17-4 19-5
  8 Minnesota-Morris 17-0 18-7

  The first record is in-region record, followed by overall record.

• NCAA Division III women’s basketball championships handbook

  Regional score reporting forms (including SOS) below:
  Atlantic | Central | East | Great Lakes | Mid-Atlantic | Northeast | South | West

Regional rankings

The men’s and women’s regional rankings have both been released.

Need to know more about the regional rankings process and what they mean? Need to know more about the NCAA Tournament? Check out our NCAA Tournament FAQ.

Through games of Sunday, Feb. 10.

The first record is in-region record, followed by overall.

• NCAA Division III men’s basketball championships handbookMen’s rankings
  Atlantic Region – NCAA data sheet
  1 SUNY-Old Westbury 20-1 21-3
  2 Ramapo 18-2 20-3
  3 Rutgers-Newark 17-6 18-6
  4 Richard Stockton 17-5 17-5
  5 SUNY-Purchase 17-5 17-5

  East – NCAA data sheet
  1 Rochester 19-2 20-2
  2 Cortland State 19-2 19-3
  3 Stevens 18-3 20-3
  4 Hobart 15-6 16-6
  5 Plattsburgh State 15-6 15-7
  6 Ithaca 14-7 15-7

  Great Lakes – NCAA data sheet
  1 Wooster 19-3 19-3
  2 Ohio Wesleyan 17-4 17-5
  3 Thomas More 19-2 20-3
  4 Capital 17-4 17-6
  5 Saint Vincent 16-3 18-5
  6 Calvin 16-1 20-3

  Mid-Atlantic – NCAA data sheet
  1 Alvernia 19-4 19-4
  2 Catholic 17-3 20-3
  3 St. Mary’s (Md.) 16-2 21-2
  4 Albright 18-5 18-5
  5 Wesley 16-2 19-5
  6 Scranton 17-6 17-6
  7 Cabrini 17-4 19-5
  8 DeSales 17-5 18-5
  9 Dickinson 15-6 17-6

  Midwest – NCAA data sheet
  1 Illinois Wesleyan 17-3 20-3
  2 Washington U. 17-4 18-4
  3 Wheaton (Ill.) 15-5 18-5
  4 North Central (Ill.) 18-3 20-3
  5 Transylvania 17-4 18-5
  6 Rose-Hulman 20-2 21-2
  7 Augustana 15-7 16-7
  8 St. Norbert 16-5 16-5

  Northeast – NCAA data sheet
  1 WPI 22-1 22-1
  2 Amherst 21-2 21-2
  3 Williams 18-3 20-3
  4 Middlebury 18-1 21-1
  5 Rhode Island College 20-3 20-3
  6 MIT 16-4 17-4
  7 Brandeis 16-6 16-6
  8 Springfield 16-7 16-7
  9 Curry 16-6 16-6
  10 Westfield State 17-4 19-4
  11 Eastern Connecticut 15-4 15-7
  12 Albertus Magnus 20-2 20-3

  South – NCAA data sheet
  1 Hampden-Sydney 17-2 21-2
  2 Mary Hardin-Baylor 20-3 20-3
  3 Emory 15-6 15-6
  4 Virginia Wesleyan 14-5 17-6
  5 Concordia (Texas) 16-4 18-5
  6 Christopher Newport 14-5 15-5
  7 Randolph 13-4 19-4
  8 Texas-Dallas 17-6 17-6

  West – NCAA data sheet
  1 St. Thomas 23-1 23-1
  2 UW-Stevens Point 19-4 19-4
  3 UW-Whitewater 18-4 19-4
  4 Whitworth 19-3 20-3
  5 Buena Vista 16-6 17-6
  6 UW-Stout 17-5 18-5
  7 Concordia-Moorhead 17-6 17-7
  8 Whitman 13-6 16-7
  9 Augsburg 17-6 17-6

  Regional score reporting forms (including SOS) below:
  Atlantic  |  East  |  Great Lakes  |  Middle Atlantic  |  Midwest  |  Northeast  |  South  |  West

  Women’s
  Atlantic Region
  1 Montclair State 23-0 23-0
  2 Catholic 19-1 22-1
  3 Baruch 21-2 22-2
  4 Marymount 18-4 20-4
  5 William Paterson 17-6 18-6
  6 Mary Washington 15-6 17-6
  7 York (Pa.) 14-5 18-5
  8 TCNJ 15-7 16-7

  Central
  1 Cornell 20-1 20-1
  2 Washington U. 17-3 18-4
  3 UW-Whitewater 16-4 18-5
  4 UW-Oshkosh 16-4 19-4
  5 Carthage 17-4 19-4
  6 UW-Superior 17-5 18-6
  7 Monmouth 17-4 18-4
  8 UW-Stevens Point 17-5 18-5

  East
  1 Ithaca 19-2 20-2
  2 Rochester 17-5 17-5
  3 New Paltz State 21-2 21-2
  4 St. Lawrence 16-6 17-6
  5 Vassar 17-4 19-4
  6 Geneseo State 15-6 16-6
  7 Oswego State 15-6 15-7
  8 Hartwick 14-5 17-6

  Great Lakes
  1 DePauw 17-0 23-0
  2 Ohio Northern 21-0 22-1
  3 Calvin 17-0 21-1
  4 Thomas More 22-1 22-1
  5 Hope 19-1 22-1
  6 La Roche 19-2 20-2
  7 Mount Union 17-5 18-5
  8 Otterbein 17-5 18-5

  Mid-Atlantic
  1 Messiah 19-1 21-2
  2 FDU-Florham 20-2 21-2
  3 Moravian 19-3 20-3
  4 Swarthmore 17-4 18-5
  5 Widener 18-4 19-4
  6 Scranton 15-6 16-7
  7 Gettysburg 17-5 17-6
  8 Juniata 16-7 16-7

  Northeast
  1 Amherst 21-1 22-1
  2 Tufts 21-1 22-1
  3 Babson 20-1 21-2
  4 Southern Maine 20-1 22-1
  5 Bridgewater State 18-3 18-3
  6 Williams 18-4 19-4
  7 Smith 20-3 20-3
  8 Emmanuel 18-3 18-5
  9 Western Connecticut 16-6 16-6
  10 U. New England 18-4 18-4

  South
  1 Ferrum 21-2 21-2
  2 Christopher Newport 20-2 21-2
  3 Louisiana College 19-2 20-2
  4 Maryville (Tenn.) 20-3 20-3
  5 Eastern Mennonite 15-3 17-5
  6 Howard Payne 20-3 20-3
  7 Trinity (Texas) 19-4 19-4
  8 Emory 19-3 19-3

  West
  1 Simpson 18-0 22-1
  2 Lewis and Clark 17-2 21-2
  3 Cal Lutheran 17-3 20-3
  4 St. Thomas 18-4 18-5
  5 Whitman 14-3 18-4
  6 Chapman 16-4 18-5
  7 Minnesota-Morris 15-0 16-7
  8 Concordia-Moorhead 18-4 18-5

  The first record is in-region record, followed by overall record.

• NCAA Division III women’s basketball championships handbookNot yet published.Regional score reporting forms (including SOS) below:
  Atlantic | Central | East | Great Lakes | Mid-Atlantic | Northeast | South | West

Regional rankings

Editors Note: Adjustments made to this blog to account for slight changes in the women’s SOS calculations as well.

For many of our mathematicians and number crunchers on the D3boards have been struggling with one thing since the Regional Rankings came out: they couldn’t get the SOS numbers the NCAA released to jive with their calculations. After all, there isn’t anything overly complicated with the calculations. The basics are this: a team’s Opponent’s Winning Percentage (OWP) x 2/3 + the Opponent’s Opponent’s Winning Percentage (OOWP) x 1/3. Another key is the fact that a multiplier of 1.25 is used for road games, 1.0 for neutral games, and 0.75 for home games in the OWP and OOWP for the men’s side of things.

For the mathematicians and the number crunchers, they break out their Excel sheets, paper, pencil and calculator, or whatever they use and they plug in the results for all Division III games into that and they come out with the overall SOS. However as I mentioned, they couldn’t figure out why their numbers weren’t adding up this past week.

Well, it turns out that is because the NCAA changed one simple thing in how they crunch the numbers and, well, forgot to tell everyone. (When reading through the 2013 Division III men’s pre-championship handbook it appears the change has not been rewritten in this material – but that is for others to figure out.)

The decision was made by the Championships Committee back in September and was apparently made because the original SOS calculations was coming up with some screwy numbers, especially in Division II where some provisional members were not playing a majority of their games in the division and that resulted in smaller win/loss numbers and thus, maybe, some inflated win-loss percentages. The previous means of calculating the SOS was apparently then causing what was perceived as inflated or deflated SOS’s.

To explain the change, let’s start with how they originally did the math for a men’s team. Here is Team A’s schedule over eleven games:

Opponent	W	L	WP	Mult.	Average
Team B	9	1	.900	1.25	1.125
Team C	9	3	.750	1.25	0.938
Team D	5	2	.714	1.25	0.893
Team E	7	4	.636	1.00	0.636
Team F	6	4	.600	1.25	0.750
Team G	6	4	.600	0.75	0.450
Team H	6	4	.600	1.25	0.750
Team I	4	5	.444	0.75	0.333
Team J	4	6	.400	1.00	0.400
Team K	4	8	.333	1.00	0.333
Team L	1	7	.125	1.25	0.156
				Total:	6.764
				SOS (total/games):	.6149

However, here is the change. They are now calculating based on each raw number, not the overall percentage. So here is Team A’s exact same schedule with this raw number calculation instead:

Opponent	W	L	Mult.	Raw Ws	Raw Ls
Team B	9	1	1.25	11.25	1.25
Team C	9	3	1.25	11.25	3.75
Team D	5	2	1.25	6.25	2.50
Team E	7	4	1.00	7.00	4.00
Team F	6	4	1.25	7.50	5.00
Team G	6	4	0.75	4.50	3.00
Team H	6	4	1.25	7.50	5.00
Team I	4	5	0.75	3.00	3.75
Team J	4	6	1.00	4.00	6.00
Team K	4	8	1.00	4.00	8.00
Team L	1	7	1.25	1.25	8.75
			Total:	67.50	51.00
			SOS (WP):	.5696

Certainly the difference between .6149 and .5696 looks large (.05!), but this is just 11 games and obviously by this point in the season we are looking at give or take 20-plus games on a team’s schedule, so the amount of data is greater and the numbers are probably a bit closer. Of course the biggest difference will come for teams that play teams with less regional results than others who maybe play all of their games in region.

Now for the women, they do not use the multiplier the men do, but if we are talking about adding just the numbers and not averaging the averages… there is a slight change. Below is a table for Team A’s opponents:

Opponent	W	L	WP
Team B	9	1	.900
Team C	9	3	.750
Team D	5	2	.714
Team E	7	4	.636
Team F	6	4	.600
Team G	6	4	.600
Team H	6	4	.600
Team I	4	5	.444
Team J	4	6	.400
Team K	4	8	.333
Team L	1	7	.143
Totals:	61	48
SOS:	.560		.556

The .560 would be the new SOS… the .556 would have been the old SOS number. Yes, the number is ever so slightly different especially compared to the men, but it is an adjustment.

This doesn’t look initially like it will have a large or dramatic impact on Division III. I am sure our mathematician friends can say more about this, but it appears the NCAA is breaking down the numbers in more detail to get more accurate information than in the old system.

I hope that helps, but I will let our math friends be the ones who can break this down further on the merits of the decision.

math · NCAA · Regional rankings · strength of schedule

The first regional rankings might well be the latest ever, at least in the post-fax machine era. But after 9 p.m. on Wednesday night, they finally got them out.

The committee used to send them out in email form, and they would generally get posted right away by people who care about Division III. Now they send them exclusively to Turner Sports, which runs NCAA.com … and they get posted whenever someone gets around to it there.

Need to know more about the regional rankings process and what they mean? Need to know more about the NCAA Tournament? Check out our NCAA Tournament FAQ.

Through games of Sunday, Feb. 3.

The first record is in-region record, followed by overall.

NCAA Division III men’s basketball championships handbook

Men’s rankings
Atlantic Region
1 Ramapo 18-1 20-2
2 SUNY-Old Westbury 18-1 19-3
3 Purchase 16-4 16-4
4 Richard Stockton 16-5 16-5
5 Rutgers-Newark 15-6 16-6

East Region
1 Rochester 18-1 19-1
2 Cortland State 17-2 17-3
3 Stevens 15-3 17-3
4 New York University 13-7 13-7
5 Hobart 12-6 13-6
6 Geneseo State 14-6 14-7

Great Lakes
1 Wooster 17-3 17-3
2 Ohio Wesleyan 16-3 16-4
3 Thomas More 17-2 18-3
4 Calvin 15-0 19-2
5 St. Vincent 14-3 16-5
6 Marietta 16-5 16-5

Mid-Atlantic
1 Catholic 16-2 19-2
2 Albright 18-3 18-3
3 St. Mary’s (Md.) 14-2 19-2
4 Alvernia 16-4 16-4
5 Wesley 14-2 17-5
6 Scranton 15-6 15-6
7 Arcadia 13-6 13-8
8 Cabrini 14-4 16-5
9 Franklin & Marshall 13-4 16-5

Midwest
1 Illinois Wesleyan 15-3 18-3
2 Transylvania 15-4 16-5
3 Wheaton (Ill.) 13-5 16-5
4 Washington U. 15-4 16-4
5 North Central (Ill.) 16-3 18-3
6 Rose-Hulman 18-2 19-2
7 Augustana 15-5 16-5
8 St. Norbert 15-4 15-4

Northeast
1 WPI 21-0 21-0
2 Amherst 20-2 20-2
3 Williams 18-2 20-2
4 Middlebury 16-1 19-1
5 Rhode Island College 18-3 18-3
6 Brandeis 15-5 15-5
7 MIT 15-4 16-4
8 Curry 15-6 15-6
9 Westfield State 15-4 17-4
10 Springfield 15-7 15-7
11 Eastern Connecticut 14-4 14-7
12 Albertus Magnus 20-2 20-3

South
1 Hampden-Sydney 15-2 19-2
2 Mary Hardin-Baylor 18-3 18-3
3 Christopher Newport 14-3 15-3
4 Concordia (Texas) 14-4 16-5
5 Emory 14-5 14-5
6 Virginia Wesleyan 11-5 14-6
7 Lynchburg 12-5 16-5
8 Guilford 13-5 16-5

West
1 St. Thomas 20-1 20-1
2 Whitworth 19-1 20-1
3 UW-Stevens Point 18-4 18-4
4 UW-Whitewater 16-4 17-4
5 UW-Stout 16-4 17-4
6 Buena Vista 15-5 16-5
7 Augsburg 15-5 15-5
8 Luther 14-4 15-6
9 Concordia-Moorhead 15-6 15-7

Regional score reporting forms (including SOS) below:
Atlantic  |  East  |  Great Lakes  |  Middle Atlantic  |  Midwest  |  Northeast  |  South  |  West

Women’s

The first record is in-region record, followed by overall record.

NCAA Division III women’s basketball championships handbook

Atlantic
1 Montclair State 22-0 22-0
2 Catholic 17-1 20-1
3 Baruch 19-1 20-1
4 Marymount 16-4 18-4
5 William Paterson 15-6 16-6
6 Mary Washington 13-6 15-6
7 York (Pa.) 13-5 17-5
8 TCNJ 14-7 15-7

Central
1 Cornell 18-1 18-1
2 Washington U. 16-2 17-3
3 Carthage 16-3 18-3
4 UW-Superior 17-3 18-4
5 Monmouth (Ill.) 16-3 17-3
6 UW-Whitewater 14-4 16-5
7 UW-Stevens Point 17-4 18-4
8 Wisconsin Lutheran 18-0 19-2

East
1 New Paltz State 18-2 18-2
2 Ithaca 17-2 18-2
3 Rochester 15-5 15-5
4 Oswego State 14-5 14-6
5 Geneseo State 14-5 15-5
6 St. Lawrence 14-5 15-5
7 Vassar 14-4 16-4
8 Hartwick 13-3 16-4

Great Lakes
1 DePauw 16-0 22-0
2 Ohio Northern 19-0 20-1
3 Calvin 14-0 18-1
4 Thomas More 20-1 20-1
5 Hope 18-1 20-1
6 La Roche 17-2 18-2
7 Mount Union 16-4 17-4
8 Otterbein 15-5 16-5

Mid-Atlantic
1 Messiah 17-1 19-2
2 FDU-Florham 18-2 19-2
3 Moravian 18-3 19-3
4 Swarthmore 15-3 16-4
5 Gettysburg 15-5 15-6
6 Juniata 15-6 15-6
7 Scranton 14-5 15-6
8 Lebanon Valley 18-3 18-3

Northeast
1 Amherst 21-0 22-0
2 Tufts 21-1 22-1
3 Southern Maine 18-1 20-1
4 Bridgewater State 17-3 17-3
5 Babson 18-1 19-2
6 Emmanuel 16-3 16-5
7 Smith 19-2 19-2
8 Williams 17-4 18-4
9 Western Connecticut 16-5 16-5
10 University of New England 17-4 17-4

South
1 Ferrum 18-2 18-2
2 Maryville (Tenn.) 18-2 18-2
3 Louisiana College 18-1 19-1
4 Christopher Newport 17-2 18-2
5 Emory 18-2 18-2
6 Howard Payne 18-3 18-3
7 Eastern Mennonite 13-3 15-5
8 Guilford 17-2 18-3

West
1 Simpson 16-0 20-1
2 Lewis and Clark 15-2 19-2
3 George Fox 13-4 16-4
4 Cal Lutheran 16-3 19-3
5 Minnesota-Morris 12-0 13-7
6 Concordia-Moorhead 17-3 17-4
7 Chapman 13-4 15-5
8 St. Thomas (Minn.) 15-4 15-5

Regional score reporting forms (including SOS) below:
Atlantic | Central | East | Great Lakes | Mid-Atlantic | Northeast | South | West

No tags

The third NCAA regional rankings of the 2011-12 season have been released. For women’s rankings, scroll down.

Need to know more about the regional rankings process and what they mean? Check our blog post — updated for 2012. Need to know more about the NCAA Tournament? Check out our NCAA Tournament FAQ.

Through games of Sunday, Feb. 19.

The first record is in-region record, followed by overall.

Men’s rankings
Atlantic Region
1 Staten Island 20-2 22-4
2 William Paterson 22-3 22-3
3 St. Joseph’s (L.I.) 21-2 21-3
4 Richard Stockton 17-6 18-7
5 New Jersey City 15-6 17-7

East Region
1 Hartwick 22-2 23-2
2 Oswego State 22-2 22-3
3 Hobart 20-4 21-4
4 New York U. 19-5 19-5
5 Medaille 22-2 23-2
6 Nazareth 17-6 17-8

Great Lakes
1 Hope 16-0 24-1
2 Wittenberg 18-4 20-5
3 Wooster 19-4 21-4
4 Ohio Wesleyan 18-6 19-6
5 Bethany 21-2 22-3
6 John Carroll 15-6 18-6

Mid-Atlantic
1 Cabrini 24-0 24-1
2 Franklin & Marshall 23-2 23-2
3 St. Mary’s (Md.) 17-5 19-6
4 Keystone 20-5 20-5
5 Messiah 17-6 18-6
6 Misericordia 19-6 19-6
7 Widener 14-7 18-7
8 Mary Washington 16-6 17-8
9 Albright 13-7 17-8

Midwest
1 Washington U. 18-5 18-6
2 Wheaton (Ill.) 17-5 19-5
3 Transylvania 21-2 22-3
4 Lake Forest 19-3 20-3
5 Illinois Wesleyan 17-6 19-6
6 Concordia (Wis.) 19-4 20-4
7 North Central (Ill.) 17-5 18-7
8 Augustana 18-5 19-5

Northeast
1 Amherst 21-2 23-2
2 Middlebury 21-2 23-2
3 MIT 23-1 23-1
4 Rhode Island College 20-5 20-5
5 Western Connecticut 20-5 20-5
6 Eastern Connecticut 20-5 20-5
7 WPI 18-6 18-6
8 Wesleyan 20-4 20-5
9 Albertus Magnus 24-1 24-1
10 Keene State 15-6 18-7
11 Becker 21-4 21-4
12 Salem State 17-7 18-7

South
1 Mary Hardin-Baylor 23-1 24-1
2 Virginia Wesleyan 21-3 22-3
3 Birmingham-Southern 21-1 24-1
4 Randolph-Macon 17-4 20-5
5 Christopher Newport 18-4 21-4
6 Emory 19-5 19-5
7 Hardin-Simmons 17-6 19-6
8 Texas-Dallas 19-4 21-4

West
1 UW-Whitewater 22-3 22-3
2 Whitworth 21-2 22-3
3 UW-River Falls 18-5 18-7
4 UW-Stevens Point 17-6 19-6
5 Claremont-Mudd-Scripps 17-1 23-1
6 St. Thomas 18-6 19-6
7 Gustavus Adolphus 18-6 19-6
8 Puget Sound 14-6 19-6
9 Whitman 16-7 18-7

Regional score reporting forms (including SOS) below:
Atlantic  |  East  |  Great Lakes  |  Middle Atlantic  |  Midwest  |  Northeast  |  South  |  West

Women’s

The first record is in-region record, followed by overall record.
Atlantic
1 Mary Washington 23-0 25-0
2 William Paterson 21-2 23-2
3 Kean 19-3 22-4
4 Mount St. Mary 21-3 22-3
5 Rutgers-Newark 17-7 17-7
6 York (Pa.) 22-4 22-4

Central
1 Chicago 24-0 24-0
2 UW-Stevens Point 20-3 21-4
3 Washington U. 19-3 20-4
4 UW-River Falls 19-5 20-5
5 UW-Whitewater 20-5 20-5
6 Illinois Wesleyan 16-5 20-5

East
1 Rochester 18-5 19-5
2 Ithaca 20-2 21-4
3 Hartwick 20-4 21-5
4 St. Lawrence 20-3 20-4
5 Buffalo State 21-2 23-2
6 Oneonta State 16-6 16-8

Great Lakes
1 Mount Union 22-1 24-1
2 DePauw 22-1 23-1
3 Calvin 17-1 23-1
4 Franklin 21-2 23-2
5 Thomas More 20-2 21-4
6 St. Vincent 20-4 20-5

Mid-Atlantic
1 Juniata 23-0 24-1
2 Lebanon Valley 21-3 22-3
3 King’s 20-3 21-4
4 Johns Hopkins 20-3 22-3
5 Messiah 21-3 22-4
6 Franklin & Marshall 18-7 19-7

Northeast
1 Amherst 23-0 25-0
2 University of New England 21-4 21-4
3 Rhode Island College 22-3 22-3
4 Tufts 20-4 20-5
5 Southern Maine 19-5 20-5
6 Bowdoin 18-5 19-6
7 Babson 22-2 23-2
8 Colby 19-6 19-6
9 Williams 17-6 19-6
10 Emmanuel 18-5 19-6

South
1 Louisiana College 20-2 22-3
2 Centre 20-3 21-3
3 Virginia Wesleyan 19-4 20-5
4 Concordia (Texas) 19-4 20-4
5 Maryville (Tenn.) 16-4 17-6
6 Eastern Mennonite 20-3 21-3

West
1 George Fox 20-0 25-0
2 St. Thomas 24-1 24-1
3 Simpson 17-5 20-5
4 Lewis & Clark 16-2 23-2
5 Gustavus Adolphus 19-6 19-6
6 Occidental 20-2 22-3

Regional score reporting forms (including SOS) below:
Atlantic | Central | East | Great Lakes | Mid-Atlantic | Northeast | South | West

No tags