Quick Hits: Predictions for Stagg Bowl XLVI

We have one game left, and we are beyond quick predictions, and beyond six predictions at that. So for the big game, we bring out a couple more experts, and we give everyone a couple hundred words to work with. We’ve been making these predictions ever since 1999, when our panel correctly picked what everyone in Division III thought was an upset — Pacific Lutheran over Rowan. Last year, our panel correctly picked Mount Union, in a 5-3 decision over Mary Hardin-Baylor.

Nobody consulted with one another. Feel free to add your pick and reasoning in the comments section below.

Pat Coleman, publisher and executive editor

Sometimes the entirety of a football season, especially a 15-game one, is a battle of attrition. Last year, surely, UMHB would have liked to have had T.J. Josey healthy for more than a couple of snaps in the title game. This year, that person could be De’Nerian Thomas for UMHB or Jared Ruth or Cole Moxie for Mount Union. Or D’Angelo Fulford for the Purple Raiders, for that matter. Regardless of who is able to go, though, the keys will likely remain the same: control the running ability of whomever is taking snaps. Keep the receivers in front of you so the quarterback can’t burn you with the deep ball. That sort of thing. When I moved my No. 1 vote from Mount Union to UMHB earlier in the season, it was with the thought that the Cru have enough quarterback options to provide the depth needed for the long haul. Now, however, the offense has to be in doubt a bit. And perhaps that’s true for both sides. Regardless, I’m looking forward to a game that has a bit more scoring than last year, despite all the time I just spent doubting everyone’s offense.
Mary Hardin-Baylor 17, Mount Union 14

Keith McMillan, national columnist and managing editor emeritus

I’ve had UMHB No. 1 since midway through the season, and in beating three top-10 teams (Hardin-Simmons, St. John’s and UW-Whitewater) to get to the first Stagg Bowl held in their home state, the Crusaders earn the right to go in favored, even against the defending champions. Mount Union’s best trait this year seems to be something that’s hard to quantify — the ability to win a game however it needs to be won, with opportunistic defense, high-powered offense, grit — so by no means is this a “it’s definitely going to happen this way” pick. Both UMHB and UMU are in the Stagg Bowl because they’re adaptable, and because they mirror each other — the direct-snap run package, the turnover-causing defenses, the swarming tacklers. So this game might not be much prettier than last year’s, unless one side figures out how to turn turnovers or special teams plays into points. If it boils down to a conservative defensive slugfest where both teams need to play mistake-free, UMHB has the edge.
Mary Hardin-Baylor 21, Mount Union 14

Adam Turer, Around the Nation columnist

Both teams enter Friday’s rematch with questions behind center. Is Jase Hammack healthy enough to start and finish the game? Is DeNerian Thomas healthy enough to provide a run/pass threat and change of pace? Will former quarterback turned wide receiver T.J. Josey be pressed into quarterback duties, a la Cecil Shorts in 2010? On the other side, is D’Angelo Fulford physically and mentally recovered from his rough outing in the semifinals? Or will the Purple Raiders be forced to rely on running back Josh Petruccelli taking direct snaps to grind out a win? I don’t think Mount Union repeats its performance from last week. Instead, I think the Purple Raiders repeat as champions for the first time since 2005-2006. Like they did in Stagg Bowl XLV, the Cru will struggle on offense due to inexperience at the quarterback position. The Purple Raiders will load up to stop Markeith Miller and will come up with enough big plays, either turnovers or on special teams, to squeeze out some points against the nation’s top scoring defense. This could be a heartwarming story for the local program, but the Purple Raiders will refuse to cooperate. Mount Union has the rare chance to do something the program has never done before, winning a Stagg Bowl outside of Salem. Mount Union’s playmakers on defense get the job done, leaving the home crowd in Shenandoah disappointed.
Mount Union 20, Mary Hardin-Baylor 12

Ryan Tipps, senior editor

Despite the fact that this Stagg Bowl features the teams with the first- and second-best scoring offenses in the nation, I don’t forsee this as being an obscenely high-scoring game. The fact of the matter is that these defenses are among the elite, too. UMHB’s journey (involving the dismantling of two Top 5 teams) has prepared them better for the destination than did Mount’s. The past two weeks have proven UMHB’s ability to expertly defend against both the pass and the run, and the team can move the ball to get the points it needs. Mount, on the other hand, has a lot of great aspects but has shown vulnerability at times, and I think they haven’t really faced anyone yet to take advantage of those soft spots the way UMHB can (and will). It’ll be a good game, but the home-state squad gets the W.
Mary Hardin-Baylor 24, Mount Union 14

Frank Rossi, Stagg Bowl sideline reporter

I see this game as a huge first-half chess match, with two teams that will resume a tight, conservative battle from last year’s game and two defenses that will thrive in that. However, the changes that UMHB made between last year and this year focused on their offense and the issues they experienced in the pocket. That meant finding a pocket passer and also a quarterback with pure speed that could ensure the ball moved out of the pocket quickly. Eventually, that will pay off for UMHB. They’ll take a lead in the second half, and that will inspire D’Angelo Fulford to fight back — an offensive showdown will finally develop between the teams. On paper, the teams line up very evenly. That means the home-state advantage matters here — with the crowd likely being 6-to-1 in favor of the CRU. That’s why I give them the edge in a higher-scoring game than many people expect.
Mary Hardin-Baylor 24, Mount Union 21

Greg Thomas, contributor and bracketology consultant

Here we are again. Despite usual and expected grumblings about bracket balance, the best two teams in the division have reached the final. Once again both teams have suffocating defenses. While I don’t expect the same absence of offense that we saw last year, points will still come at a premium. Both teams also enter with some questions at quarterback. UMHB has been nursing Jase Hammack’s shoulder through these playoffs and his primary backup — DeNerian Thomas — is questionable for Friday. On the other side D’Angelo Fulford has battled an ankle issue and inconsistency through these playoffs; enough so that the Purple Raiders turned almost exclusively to a running back direct snap package in the fourth quarter of their semifinal. The run defenses being deployed in this game will demand that these quarterbacks conjure a moment of two of brilliance, without backbreaking turnovers, for their teams to be successful. I expect this game to tilt on a big special teams play or a a turnover. Through these playoffs, the Crusaders have taken better care of the ball and, if there is one area of clear separation between these teams, it is the Cru’s kick return units. I’m going with the Crusaders to win their second title in a tight, thrilling ballgame. Mary Hardin-Baylor 20, Mount Union 16.

Kevin Niehus, Division III football analyst and former Thomas More quarterback

Arguably the top two defenses in the division, each facing an offense that put up video game numbers in their respective league. Throw that out: Both leagues were down this year. This game will be another defensive battle, like last year in Salem.   We have seen both teams prepare their version of the Wildcat for this game, with both having won titles by running some variation of it in past years.  I like Mount Union in this game, even though it’s a road game.   They are disciplined enough to keep UMHB WR’s AND kick returners out of the end zone. We have all seen the highlights, Simms runs 90 yards faster than most humans run the 40. I like that Mount Union has a QB in Fulford who has been in an intense spotlight for the past 56 weeks.  He can erase a lot of the questioning on Friday night, and I guarantee he knows that. I just feel like he makes one more play – and that’s all it will take to separate these two teams. One caveat: Mount Union must play clean: No personal fouls and no procedure penalties. If I’m Vince Kehres I’m confident in my players to play fast, make physical mistakes not mental ones.   Mount Union 13, Mary Hardin-Baylor 10.

Eric Drennan, Temple Daily Telegram Sports Editor

Both teams have high-scoring offenses, stingy defenses and quality coaching staffs, so this game is a toss-up that could be decided in three areas. First: If Mount Union can shut down UMHB’s rushing attack like it did last year and free up a Purple Raiders defense with 67 sacks to pin its ears back and go after the passer, then I like Mount Union’s chances. If the Crusaders can have some balance on offense, they might have the upper hand because of their playmakers on the outside. Second: If Mount Union quarterback D’Angelo Fulford is able to consistently make plays with his legs when UMHB drops into pass coverage, the Purple Raiders have the edge. The Crusaders have to keep Fulford in the pocket. A QB who is dangerous on the run will give any defense fits. Mount Union has one. UMHB doesn’t. Third: I think UMHB has the advantage when it comes to special teams, specifically the return game. Aaron Sims and K.J. Miller can turn a game around because they’re threats to score anytime they get the ball in space. All of that being said, of course I’m picking UMHB. The people in this football-crazy state would find a tall tree and a short rope if I didn’t. I’ll say UMHB 24, Mount Union 21 in what will seem like an absolute scorefest after the last two Stagg Bowls.
Mary Hardin-Baylor 24, Mount Union 21


Quick Hits: Predicting the semifinals

With three Purple Powers and the newcomers in blue, we have a slightly different look to our national semifinals. Or, if you prefer, playing the role of the Wesley Wolverines in this year’s Week 15, we have the Johns Hopkins Blue Jays. Hopefully we get two great games that will be great examples of Division III football to the audience on ESPN3, but our panelists will let you know below how likely that is.

Enough with the pleasantries. Here’s our takes:

— Pat Coleman (photo of Mount Union’s Josh Petruccelli and Justin Hill by

The Quick Hits
playoff crew:

Keith McMillan
Ryan Tipps
Pat Coleman
Pat Coleman
Adam Turer
Adam Turer
Frank Rossi
Frank Rossi
Greg Thomas

Johns Hopkins (12-1) at Mount Union (13-0), 12 p.m. ET, ESPN3

Keith: The Blue Jays will win over a lot of hearts by playing fast, fearlessly and having fun with an opportunity that scares other teams out of their cleats. These Purple Raiders, especially if hobbled, aren’t unbeatable, but they are opportunistic defensively and deep enough offensively to play whatever kind of game is necessary to win. Mount Union has just 13 turnovers through 13 games, including only two INTs thrown by QB D’Angelo Fulford, and  to win, Johns Hopkins is going to need to generate either turnovers or a ton of offense against an elite defense. Mount Union 35, Johns Hopkins 24.

Ryan: Mount doesn’t get challenged on the field very often, but I think JHU is peaking at just the right time to make this game a fun one to watch. Hopkins leads the nation in offense and has the right kind of multi-dimensional attack, led by quarterback David Tammaro, that will keep Mount alert for the full 60 minutes. As I said in my feature this week: “To defend against Hopkins, it’s a pick-your-poison scenario: Stack the box, and the Jays will pick you apart downfield; play on your heels, and they’ll get you in the gut.” So far in the playoffs, Hopkins has matched up well against its opponents, but nobody truly matches up easily against Mount Union, so JHU being able to adjust their strategy on the fly will be the main ingredient to keeping Mount from running away with the game, as they’re apt to do any week of the year (they are No. 1 for a reason). Mount Union 31, Johns Hopkins 21.

Pat: I know that on the podcast we call the UWW/UMHB matchup the better matchup, but this is just as intriguing to me. We think we’ve never seen Johns Hopkins playing this well, and the Blue Jays have been in the ballpark against Division III football’s elite in the past. Mount Union hasn’t fired on every cylinder against big opponents. If Muhlenberg was within 14 points late in the game, could Johns Hopkins be the same? David Tammaro at quarterback gives JHU a quality weapon behind center and if D’Angelo Fulford isn’t at 100 percent, or doesn’t have both Justin Hill and Jared Ruth, Tammaro may be the best quarterback on the field. (And maybe this scenario sees Josh Petruccelli take a lot of snaps). For entertainment purposes, I hope it’s entertaining enough in the fourth quarter. Mount Union 28, Johns Hopkins 24.

Adam: Johns Hopkins boasts the best, most complete offense that Mount Union will have faced this season. David Tammaro will not be intimidated by the moment. If Tyler Messinger is healthy, Tammaro will have a deep backfield behind him to complement the depth of the wide receiver corps. The Blue Jays will try to spread the field and open up the middle for Messinger and Stuart Walters. Because the JHU offense goes sideline to sideline, the Blue Jays will hope that Mount Union’s defense might wear down. The starters have rarely had to compete for four quarters in a game this season. Maybe that will allow the Blue Jays and their nation-best offense (564.4 yards per game) to put pressure on the hosts in the fourth quarter. But Hopkins hasn’t faced a defense like the Purple Raiders. Louis Berry and Gabe Brown are shutdown corners, eager to make a big play and get the ball back in the Mount Union offense’s hands. It’s not easy to spread out or wear down a defense that has such speed and quickness up the middle with Danny Robinson, Trey Williams, Nick Brish, and Austin White. Even if the Blue Jays are able to move the ball effectively, they won’t be able to break the big plays that it would take to upset Mount Union. I think it will be close and the Blue Jays will put up some points, but it won’t be enough to escape Alliance with a win. Mount Union 35, Johns Hopkins 26.

Frank: This game plays out similar to the game Mount Union won against Muhlenberg — a somewhat sluggish chess match will develop early, but by the middle of the third quarter, the size and speed differences for Mount Union will begin to show through for separation on the scoreboard.  Take nothing away from Johns Hopkins — they have bounced back with authority since the Susquehanna loss this year.  To me, this is the epitome of “sometimes you need a bad loss to lead you to good wins,” and they keep growing as a team.  Like last week, they have to play turnover-free football to have a chance in this game.  But they also need to establish the run to enable David Tammaro to be effective.  A team like Mount Union possesses linebackers that can both spy on Tammaro to take away his run and drop back into coverage on pass plays — their versatility at that position will hamper the Hopkins “Plan C” of letting Tammaro tuck and run.  Because of this, the game will be truly won at the line of scrimmage because the run will be key for both teams, especially in the first half. Mount Union 40, Johns Hopkins 20.

Greg: The Blue Jays have been on the same field with Mount Union just two years ago and more than held their own. There are a lot of new faces on both sides in this matchup, but that experience does take away the first-timers-against-Mount-Union narrative that we’re usually fond of. Both teams are better versions of their 2016 selves. Purple Raider health is an issue, particularly at the skill positions on offense. Can the Petro-cat work for extended periods of time this week? I don’t think the Purple Raiders care to find out. Johns Hopkins has a dynamic offense that can put up some points on Mount Union. Blue Jay quarterback David Tammaro and his cohorts are probably going to need to find 30 points to have a chance. Like the 2016 contest, I see Johns Hopkins pushing Mount Union to the limit, but coming up just a tad short. Mount Union 31, Johns Hopkins 24.

UW-Whitewater (12-0) at Mary Hardin-Baylor (13-0), 2:30 CT, ESPN3

UMHB logoKeith: Some Cru backers like to complain about UMHB having to face the toughest road to the Stagg Bowl. But it’s a blessing in disguise, because after beating No. 7 Hardin-Simmons twice and No. 3 St. John’s last week, what’s a game against No. 5 but another test? UMHB has never beaten UW-Whitewater, and this year’s editions are mirror images, down to each averaging 6 yards per carry and allowing 2.1. Something’s got to give, so watch the line play and the tackling for a clue. Ultimately, a UW-Whitewater secondary that’s allowed a stack of big pass plays in the playoffs might get burned for another one, deciding another weird-score matchup of these purple powers. Mary Hardin-Baylor 23, UW-Whitewater 19.

UMHB logoRyan: Last week I was a bit soft on UW-Whitewater — this week, I was close to shifting gears and predicting a renewed UMU/UWW Stagg Bowl. However, UW-W’s quarterfinal 1-9 passing stat line, with an interception, is a hard one to overlook. Against UMHB, Whitewater isn’t going to be able to jump out to the kind of lead that it did against Bethel, thus controlling the clock and pounding the rock for the remainder of the game. It will need to be able to successfully complete passes and find innovative ways to move the ball. UMHB has four All-Region guys in its line and linebacking corps, so the run game isn’t going to be as effective. The Cru, on the other hand, has a good number of offensive weapons and should be able to find ways to pick apart the Warhawk D. Mary Hardin-Baylor 28, UW-Whitewater 20.

UMHB logoPat: I’m going to provide the alternate scenario from the one where Mary Hardin-Baylor wins a low-scoring game. Suppose, if you will, that Jase Hammack is still bothered by his late-game injury from the quarterfinals. Suppose that De’Nerian Thomas is not quite as capable of moving the offense and testing the Warhawks pass defense the same way that St. Norbert did. Suppose the Cru turn the ball over a couple of times (see Mary Hardin-Baylor vs. Hardin-Simmons, Oct. 6). At this point, you’re probably thinking I’m setting you up for a UWW pick, but I’m not. Even in this scenario, I still think the Cru have a path to victory. Thomas would be similar but more athletic than the quarterback UWW faced last week. Markeith Miller is in the same boat. The UWW defense will certainly keep Miller from running all over the yard, but that probably won’t be enough, although it might take a special teams score to win it. Mary Hardin-Baylor 17, UW-Whitewater 13.

UMHB logoAdam: Defense, defense, and more defense. Two of the nation’s top scoring defenses will grind out a slugfest down in Texas. The Cru want to make the Warhawks one-dimensional and force Cole Wilber to beat them. Similarly, the Warhawks want to slow Markeith Miller and force a banged-up Jase Hammack or an inexperienced DeNerian Thomas to air it out. I expect the Cru’s game plan will feature a methodical pace, with the offense content to win the field position battle rather than press for big plays. The defense was exposed by Jackson Erdmann last week, but was able to force turnovers to seal the victory. The Cru allowed just 47 rushing yards to St. John’s. If they can get an early lead and force the Warhawks to throw the ball more than 15 times in an effort to catch up, the home team will have the advantage. If Whitewater is able to get the lead early, the rushing attack of Ronny Ponick and Alex Peete will try to wear down one of the nation’s top defenses. Mary Hardin-Baylor boasts the nation’s top turnover margin, and the Cru may need to come up with another big takeaway to decide what should be a low-scoring, tightly contested semifinal classic. Mary Hardin-Baylor 14, UW-Whitewater 9.

UMHB logoFrank: I expect a close one from start to finish, especially with the ball hawks we’ve seen all season in the UMHB defense. It seemed last week that the weakness defensively for the Cru would be a potent passing attack, but even in that situation, they still pulled in turnovers. Cole Wilber is not Jackson Erdmann — he is a very good quarterback, but the likelihood of any UW-Whitewater passing attack being effective is much lower this week. On the flip side, the “pound the rock” mentality will balance time of possession and speed up this game for the Warhawks. They know a shootout would not work to their advantage — so expect them to play a possession game on offense while relying on their defense to force punts and turnovers to further help shorten the game. If the time of possession is not something to the effect of 35:00/25:00 in the Warhawks’ favor, the Cru will get a bus ticket to Shenandoah. Mary Hardin-Baylor 24, UW-Whitewater 14.

Greg: The Crusaders have taken over as Mount Union’s primary December foil, but these Warhawks are back in the semis and looking to reclaim their spot in the Stagg Bowl. Despite eye-popping numbers throughout much of the season, UMHB’s extraordinary offense has once again looked very ordinary in these playoffs. Offensively, the Warhawks have settled into a familiar rock-pounding rhythm. Both defenses are absolutely suffocating and, as if they needed the help, should be aided by a strong winds at Crusader Stadium on Saturday. This one has all the makings of a defensive slugfest where turnovers and a special teams play may spell the difference. It took a pair of long touchdown passes for UMHB to get by St. John’s in the quarterfinal and the Crusaders may not find that same luck this week. The Warhawks may upset a lot of people from Indianapolis to suburban Houston this weekend, but they don’t really care. UW-Whitewater 15, Mary Hardin-Baylor 13.

We invite you to add your predictions in the comments below. Download the Around the Nation podcast on Mondays and Fridays.



Quick Hits: We predict the quarterfinals

We’re down to four games, so it’s time to bring a little commentary back — here’s our take on the national quarterfinal games, with, perhaps, something resembling explanation.

Keith McMillan, Ryan Tipps, Pat Coleman, Adam Turer, Frank Rossi and Greg Thomas each take their crack at it this week and every week from here to the Stagg Bowl. Photo: Jonel Reed streaking up the sidelines against Berry. (Photo by Joe Fusco,

Live video, live stats of quarterfinal games

— Pat Coleman

St. John’s at Mary Hardin-Baylor

Keith’s take: Mary Hardin-Baylor 35, St. John’s 21. This is the Nos. 2 and 3 teams in the Top 25, so let’s just enjoy it. The Johnnies have the best quarterback on the field, but this will be the fastest defense he’s seen since the Big Ten. (It’s also No. 1 nationally vs. the pass, with 26 INTs and 4 TDs allowed.) UMHB showed last week that not even its quarterback issues are actual issues, and I think the Cru plays its closest game of the year and gives up a season-high point total, and still wins with room to breathe.
Ryan’s take: Mary Hardin-Baylor 35, St. John’s 24. There’s so much to be drawn to with the Johnnies returning to the level of play we saw in the early 2000s, but it’s hard to go against a defense that has only twice this year given up double-digits on the scoreboard (and only 15 points total this postseason). Despite early-season coaching drama and season-long quarterback shuffling, the Cru’s level of play has been absolutely crippling for its opponents.
Pat Coleman
Pat’s take: Mary Hardin-Baylor 27, St. John’s 21The biggest question for me is about the St. John’s defense, which gave up 609 yards of total offense to St. Thomas. They bent a whole lot, and they broke a little, in giving up 20 points, but picked off five passes. They’ll need to figure out a way to stop the UMHB run game, since the Cru could simply run them to oblivion. However, I do think that the Johnnies will score some points, and I’m looking for a game which is close at the end.
Adam Turer
Adam’s take: Mary Hardin-Baylor 43, St. John’s 42.The most exciting game of this round features two electric offenses. The Johnnies have the edge at the quarterback position, but can their defense keep up with the speed of the Cru? UMHB seems destined to play three more games in its home state, but faces its toughest challenge yet.
Frank Rossi
Frank’s take: Mary Hardin-Baylor 24, St. John’s 21.The Cru jets out to an early lead, and it will be too little, too late in a comeback attempt by Jackson Erdmann and the Johnnies.
Greg’s take: Mary Hardin-Baylor 31, St. John’s 28.Can Jackson Erdmann find enough time and space to give the Johnnies a chance? I believe so. I also believe the Cru have enough offense of their own to outlast the Johnnies and advance.

Hansen odds to advance: Mary Hardin-Baylor, 74%.
Consensus: Mary Hardin-Baylor, but it gets closer with every prediction, so by Saturday, who knows?

Bethel at UW-Whitewater

Keith’s take: UW-Whitewater 34, Bethel 24. This game might lack the flash of other matchups, but for those who like mauling lines, backs who keep their feet churning and teams who exude joy, it’ll be the best matchup of the quarterfinals. The Warhawks, for a team that won by 33 in Round 2, cut it close in several ways and will have to tighten up against the Royals, but ultimately they are too deep and too adaptable to any style of game to be worn down. Warhawks pull away late.
Ryan’s take: Bethel 41, UW-Whitewater 38. I suspect I’m bucking my colleagues here, but Bethel has been so good over the past three weeks (averaging more than 400 yards of offense a game and putting so much pressure on opponents’ quarterbacks) that it’ll be hard to staunch that momentum.
Pat Coleman
Pat’s take: UW-Whitewater 24, Bethel 15. Get all your rock-pounding right here. Or your smash-mouthing. Harry Henschler and Kyle Kilgore on each side will provide focus points for the opposing offensive lines, but hardly the only players worth noting on defense. I think points will be more at a premium because of the defensive performers and because of offenses that like to keep the ball on the ground.
Adam Turer
Adam’s take: UW-Whitewater 17, Bethel 10. Another matchup of similar styles. The Warhawks and Royals butter their bread with rushing and defense. This is going to be a classic Wisconsin-Minnesota slugfest. The Royals defense will need to keep it close, so that UW-W can’t force Jaran Roste into more passes than Bethel would like to attempt.
Frank Rossi
Frank’s take: UW-Whitewater 27, Bethel 14. Rush defense has been both teams’ specialty this year, but the Warhawks will overcome the Royals’ ground-stop after Cole Wilber forces Bethel to diversify their defense.
Greg’s take: UW-Whitewater 28, Bethel 10This isn’t the Pound The Rock Warhawks of championship vintage, but the home side should be able to grind down the Royals at the line of scrimmage and inch away in the last 20 minutes.

Hansen odds to advance: UW-Whitewater, 77%.
Consensus: Non-unanimous, but UW-Whitewater in a relatively low-scoring battle.

Muhlenberg at Mount Union

Keith’s take: Mount Union 45, Muhlenberg 14. In another matchup, I could see the Mules advancing again, but they’d need everyone on defense to play like Frankie Feaster and Nick Sirico to match what the Purple Raiders lineup brings. And then there’s the matter of the opportunistic Mount Union defense.
Ryan’s take: Mount Union 49, Muhlenberg 14. There’s really very little stopping the Purple Raiders from getting back to the Stagg Bowl in a couple of weeks, especially seeing how D’Angelo Fulford performed being back under center. Muhlenberg has done admirably this postseason and should be able to use this as a springboard to better things in the coming years.
Pat Coleman
Pat’s take: Mount Union 53, Muhlenberg 7. This presents an opportunity for the Purple Raider 2’s to earn back some trust with the Mount Union fans, regardless of their status with the coaches.
Adam Turer
Adam’s take: Mount Union 45, Muhlenberg 17. The Mules’ historic run ends here. Mount Union has too many weapons on offense even if D’Angelo Fulford is less than 100 percent. It might be close early, but the Purple Raiders will pull away with big plays from special teams and defense. The Mules have a deep and talented secondary, but have not seen wide receivers like Justin Hill and Jared Ruth.
Frank Rossi
Frank’s take: Mount Union 47, Muhlenberg 20. The Mules will be able to keep this close for the first quarter, but little by little, Mount Union will pull away after wearing down a stalwart Muhlenberg defense.
Greg’s take: Mount Union 48, Muhlenberg 10. Congratulations are in order to Muhlenberg on its historic run to the quarterfinals, but Alliance is where a lot of historic seasons meet their end.

Hansen odds to advance: Mount Union, 95%.
Consensus: Mount Union, by varying amounts of a whole bunch.

RPI at Johns Hopkins

Keith’s take: Johns Hopkins 38, RPI 24. On one hand, RPI just snuffed out a top-five team led by an all-American QB and the nation’s No. 2 defense. On the other, the Blue Jays just hung 58 on a Frostburg defense that was allowing 14.4. Even in the rain, I like David Tammaro and Co. to keep it going.
Ryan’s take: Johns Hopkins 31, RPI 21. The massive second-half adjustments Hopkins made last week are hard to look past — that’s the kind of thing that sets great playoff teams apart. JHU has the tools to advance, but it will need to keep from turning the ball over so often as Brockport did against RPI in Round 2.
Pat Coleman
Pat’s take: Johns Hopkins 31, RPI 17. Take that, state schools. Academic powerhouses for the win! (Well, Johns Hopkins for the actual win.) Looking for the JHU offense to be clicking in full gear on Saturday.
Adam Turer
Adam’s take: Johns Hopkins 31, RPI 14.The only unranked team still playing gives opposing quarterbacks fits. If David Tammaro can do what Joe Germinerio couldn’t and solve the Engineers, the Blue Jays will advance to the semis for the first time. Johns Hopkins is comfortable playing a high-scoring shootout, but does RPI’s offense have the power to keep up?
Frank Rossi
Frank’s take: RPI 24, Johns Hopkins 21. The game sets up similar to the RPI/Brockport game, but on paper, Brockport had a slightly better defense than Hopkins. The turnover ratio gives RPI a narrow win, especially if it rains.
Greg’s take: Johns Hopkins 35, RPI 17. RPI’s defense did a whole lot of bending last weekend, but survived several late pushes from Brockport. The Blue Jays are on an absolute tear right now and may well push the Engineers past the breaking point.

Hansen odds to advance: Johns Hopkins, 91%.
Consensus: Johns Hopkins, to everyone but the turnover beancounter.

We invite you to add your predictions in the comments below. Download the Around the Nation podcast on Mondays, where Pat and Keith review the Quick Hits that were prescient, and the Quick Misses that were terribly off base.