NCAA’s 2011 regional rankings, Week 2

The second men’s and women’s regional rankings of the 2010-11 season have been released. For women’s rankings, scroll down.

More about what regional rankings mean
The basics on the NCAA Tournament
Week 1 regional rankings

The first record is overall record, followed by in-region record. Through games of Feb. 6.

Men’s rankings
Atlantic Region

1 Ramapo 17-4 16-2
2 Kean 15-7 14-5
3 Mount Saint Mary 15-5 15-5
4 SUNY-Purchase 16-4 16-4
5 Montclair State 17-5 11-5
East
1 Oswego State 16-3 16-3
2 Rochester 16-4 15-3
3 Hobart 16-4 16-3
4 Stevens 15-5 15-5
5 Ithaca 15-5 14-5
6 Plattsburgh State 14-6 13-4
Great Lakes
1 Wooster 20-1 17-1
2 Hope 16-5 12-1
3 Wabash 17-4 16-4
4 Marietta 19-2 16-2
5 Penn State-Behrend 18-2 18-1
6 Thiel 15-6 12-3
Middle Atlantic
1 La Roche 19-2 18-2
2 Wesley 15-6 14-2
3 St. Mary’s (Md.) 18-4 15-2
4 Elizabethtown 16-4 15-4
5 Cabrini 16-4 16-4
6 Keystone 16-4 16-4
7 DeSales 16-5 14-5
8 Gwynedd-Mercy 16-4 15-3
9 Franklin and Marshall 17-4 15-4
Midwest
1 Augustana (Ill.) 20-1 19-1
2 Concordia (Wis.) 17-3 15-2
3 Hanover 15-5 15-5
4 Illinois Wesleyan 15-5 14-5
5 Edgewood 14-7 14-5
6 Manchester 15-6 14-5
7 Milwaukee School of Engineering 15-5 14-5
8 St. Norbert 16-4 16-4
Northeast
1 Williams 21-1 19-1
2 Middlebury 18-1 16-1
3 Amherst 20-0 19-0
4 Western Connecticut State 19-2 18-2
5 WPI 18-3 18-2
6 Becker 17-3 17-3
7 Elms 15-6 13-5
8 Rhode Island College 13-7 13-7
9 Brandeis 13-6 13-6
10 Bowdoin 13-7 13-7
11 MIT 15-6 15-5
South
1 Virginia Wesleyan 19-1 16-1
2 Randolph-Macon 19-3 17-3
3 Ferrum 19-2 16-2
4 Mary Hardin-Baylor 17-4 17-4
5 Texas-Dallas 16-5 15-4
6 Emory 16-4 15-4
7 Centre 15-4 13-4
8 North Carolina Wesleyan 15-6 10-4
West
1 Whitworth 21-0 21-0
2 St. Thomas 18-2 17-2
3 UW-River Falls 19-3 17-2
4 UW-Stevens Point 18-3 17-3
5 Chapman 18-3 14-1
6 Carleton 13-7 13-5
7 Whitman 15-6 10-4
8 Lewis and Clark 15-6 9-4
9 St. Olaf 15-6 14-6

Women’s rankings
Women’s rankings have in-region record first, followed by overall record.

Atlantic
1. Kean 16-1 19-3
2. Mount Saint Mary (New York) 18-2 18-2
3. William Paterson 17-3 18-3
4. Gallaudet 17-0 19-0
5. Richard Stockton 14-6 15-7
6. Baruch 16-3 17-3

Central
1. Illinois Wesleyan 13-3 16-4
2. UW-Stevens Point 19-2 19-2
3. UW-La Crosse 16-5 17-5
4. UW-Whitewater 13-5 16-5
5. Chicago 17-3 17-3
6. Washington U. 14-2 17-3

East
1. Medaille 19-2 19-2
2. Rochester 14-4 16-4
3. Geneseo State 16-1 18-2
4. Cortland State 14-4 14-4
5. Ithaca 14-3 15-5
6. Oneonta State 15-4 16-5

Great Lakes
1. Thomas More 20-0 21-0
2. Hope 17-1 20-1
3. Calvin 14-1 18-4
4. Denison 19-0 21-0
5. Hanover 18-1 19-1
6. DePauw 14-1 18-3

Mid-Atlantic
1. Lebanon Valley 19-1 20-1
2. Juniata 16-3 16-6
3. Johns Hopkins 17-4 17-4
4. Gettysburg 15-5 16-5
5. Messiah 12-4 13-6
6. Widener 14-5 15-6

Northeast
1. Amherst 21-1 21-1
2. Bowdoin 18-3 18-4
3. Babson 19-0 21-0
4. Colby 15-4 17-4
5. Williams 17-3 19-3
6. Western Connecticut 15-2 17-3
7. Bates 15-5 17-6
8. Southern Maine 14-5 14-7
9. Eastern Connecticut 15-4 15-6
10. Tufts 14-5 15-5

South
1. Greensboro 20-0 21-0
2. Christopher Newport 17-2 19-2
3. Louisiana College 16-1 18-1
4. Randolph-Macon 17-2 17-4
5. Bridgewater (Va.) 15-3 17-3
6. Texas-Dallas 16-4 17-4

West
1. Coe 18-2 19-2
2. Chapman 12-3 18-4
3. Simpson 15-3 17-4
4. Lewis and Clark 12-3 16-5
5. Wartburg 18-3 19-3
6. Puget Sound 14-3 17-4

NCAA’s 2011 regional rankings, Week 1

The first men’s and women’s regional rankings of the 2010-11 season have been released. Scroll down for women’s rankings.

Need to know more about the regional rankings process and what they mean? Check our blog post. Need to know more about the NCAA Tournament? Check out our NCAA Tournament FAQ.

The first record is overall record, followed by in-region record.

Men’s rankings
Atlantic Region

1 Ramapo 16-4 15-2
2 Kean 14-6 13-4
3 Staten Island 14-4 13-3
4 St. Joseph’s (L.I.) 15-2 13-2
5 Montclair State 16-4 10-4

East Region
1 Oswego State 14-3 14-3
2 Ithaca 15-4 14-4
3 Rochester 14-4 13-3
4 Hobart 14-4 14-3
5 Plattsburgh State 12-5 11-3
6 Stevens 12-5 12-5

Great Lakes Region
1 Wooster 19-0 16-0
2 Hope 14-5 10-1
3 Wabash 16-3 15-3
4 Marietta 17-2 14-2
5 Wittenberg 14-5 11-3
6 Penn State-Behrend 16-2 16-1

Mid-Atlantic Region
1 Elizabethtown 15-3 14-3
2 La Roche 17-2 16-2
3 Wesley 13-6 12-1
4 St. Mary’s (Md.) 15-4 12-2
5 Cabrini 13-4 13-4
6 Keystone 14-3 14-3
7 DeSales 14-5 12-5
8 Gwynedd-Mercy 13-4 12-3
9 Franklin and Marshall 15-4 14-4

Midwest Region
1 Augustana (Ill.) 19-0 18-0
2 Concordia (Wis.) 16-2 15-2
3 Illinois Wesleyan 14-5 13-5
4 Edgewood 13-6 13-4
5 Hanover 13-5 13-5
6 St. Norbert 15-3 15-3
7 Anderson (Ind.) 14-5 12-4
8 Milwaukee Engineering 14-5 13-5

South Region
1 Virginia Wesleyan 18-1 14-1
2 Randolph-Macon 17-3 15-3
3 Ferrum 18-2 16-2
4 Centre 15-3 13-3
5 Mary Hardin-Baylor 15-4 15-4
6 Texas-Dallas 14-5 13-4
7 Emory 14-4 14-4
8 East Texas Baptist 13-5 12-5

Northeast Region
1 Williams 19-1 17-1
2 Middlebury 16-1 14-1
3 Amherst 18-0 17-0
4 Western Connecticut State 17-2 16-2
5 WPI 17-3 17-2
6 Becker 16-3 16-3
7 Elms 13-5 11-4
8 Eastern Connecticut State 13-5 11-4
9 Brandeis 13-4 13-4
10 Bowdoin 12-5 12-5
11 Rhode Island College 12-7 12-7

West Region
1 Whitworth 19-0 19-0
2 St. Thomas 17-1 16-1
3 UW-River Falls 18-2 16-1
4 UW-Stevens Point 17-3 16-3
5 Chapman 17-3 14-1
6 Lewis and Clark 14-5 12-5
7 Gustavus Adolphus 12-6 11-5
8 Carleton 11-7 11-5
9 Augsburg 12-6 12-6

For women’s basketball, the committee ranks the top six eligible teams from each region, with the exception of the Northeast region, which ranks 10 teams.

The first record is in-region record, followed by overall record.

Atlantic Region
1. Kean 14-0 17-2
2. Mount Saint Mary 17-2 17-2
3. William Paterson 15-3 16-3
4. Gallaudet 16-0 18-0
5. Richard Stockton 12-5 13-6
6. Baruch 15-3 16-3

Central Region
1. Illinois Wesleyan 12-3 15-4
2. UW-Stevens Point 18-2 18-2
3. UW-Whitewater 13-3 16-3
4. Chicago 15-3 15-3
5. Washington U. 12-2 15-3
6. Millikin 14-4 14-5

East Region
1. Medaille 17-2 17-2
2. Rochester 12-4 14-4
3. Geneseo State 13-1 15-2
4. New Paltz State 11-5 11-7
5. Oneonta State 14-2 15-3
6. Cortland State 13-4 13-4

Great Lakes Region
1. Thomas More 18-0 19-0
2. Denison 17-0 19-0
3. Calvin 13-0 17-3
4. Hanover 16-1 17-1
5. Hope 15-1 18-1
6. St. Vincent 15-2 17-2

Mid-Atlantic Region
1. Lebanon Valley 15-1 18-1
2. Johns Hopkins 16-3 16-3
3. Juniata 14-3 14-6
4. Widener 13-4 14-5
5. Messiah 11-4 12-6
6. Scranton 12-3 14-5

Northeast Region
1. Amherst 18-1 19-1
2. Williams 17-1 19-1
3. Babson 17-0 19-0
4. Bowdoin 15-3 15-4
5. Western Connecticut State 14-2 16-3
6. Bates 14-4 16-5
7. Eastern Connecticut State 13-4 13-6
8. Colby 12-4 14-4
9. Southern Maine 13-4 13-6
10. Tufts 14-3 15-3

South Region
1. Greensboro 17-0 18-0
2. Christopher Newport 16-2 18-2
3. Louisiana College 15-1 17-1
4. Randolph-Macon 14-2 14-4
5. Roanoke 11-3 11-4
6. Texas-Dallas 15-4 16-4

West Region
1. Coe 16-2 17-2
2. Lewis and Clark 11-2 15-4
3. Simpson 15-2 17-3
4. St. Benedict 14-3 16-3
5. Wartburg 16-3 17-3
6. Puget Sound 12-3 15-4

Playoff primer: Pool B, Pool C

From now until the end of the regular season you may well see a lot of Division III buzzwords floating about on our front page, here in the Daily Dose and on our message boards. Pool A, Pool B, Pool C, OWP, OOWP … what do those all mean?

  • First weekly NCAA regional rankings posted
  • Pool A, Pool B and Pool C are the labels given to groups (also known as Pools) of bids awarded to the playoffs. The field is 61 men’s teams and 64 women’s teams culminating in the Final Four and national title games in Salem, Va. (men) and Bloomington, Ill. (women).

    Understanding Pool A is fairly simple — let’s just pretend that ‘A’ stands for automatic. Those are the automatic bids that are awarded. There are 42 conferences with men’s automatic bids and 43 conferences with women’s automatic bids. Every conference other than the UAA awards its automatic bid to the winner of a conference tournament.

    If you are not in one of those conferences, there is one bid set aside for you, which is what’s referred to as Pool B. The best team out of that group, which includes independents and (for men only) the Great South Athletic Conference teams, gets a bid as well.

    Every eligible team not already selected is dropped into Pool C, which consists of 18 men’s and 20 women’s at-large bids. At-large bids are determined using the NCAA’s criteria, which includes regional winning percentage, strength of schedule, head-to-head competition, results against common opponents and results against regionally ranked teams.

    If your conference has an automatic bid and your team doesn’t win it, then you are only eligible for Pool C bids. If your conference doesn’t have an automatic bid, you are eligible for Pool B or, if you don’t make that cut, Pool C.

    Q: Why is the women’s tournament 64 but the men’s only 61?
    A:
    There are more schools with women’s basketball teams than men’s basketball teams. As more schools join Division III (or more women’s-only schools go co-ed), the men’s tournament will grow to 64. In fact, we only need one more eligible team to get a 62-team men’s basketball NCAA Tournament field.

    Q: How can my team guarantee it will get into the playoffs?
    A:
    Win your conference’s automatic bid. There’s no guarantees otherwise.

    Q: If the two best teams are in the same region, will they be placed in separate brackets?
    A:
    This is at least possible, but highly unlikely. They don’t seed this tournament like a D-I tournament, unfortunately. Teams are placed in groups according to geography and seeded, though keeping teams from having to travel 500 miles in the first round is more important to the NCAA than maintaining proper matchups. We can expect from history that the women’s basketball committee will do its best to separate the top teams. The history in men’s basketball is mixed at best.

    Q: There are a lot of criteria to go through. How can I tell where my team stands?
    A:
    The NCAA releases regional rankings over the final weeks of the regular season, starting today. However, being No. 6 in one region doesn’t necessarily mean you’re ahead of a team that’s No. 7 in one of the other seven.

    Q: So if I’m ranked seventh in these rankings, I’m in the playoffs?
    A:
    No. There are still the 42/43 automatic bids. They’ll all get in first. Take the automatic bids out of the rankings (and keep in mind some conferences don’t have anyone in these rankings) and one Pool B team, then the remaining 18/20 get in.

    Q: We’re ranked in the D3hoops.com Top 25. Sin
    ce the bracket has more than 60 teams, we should be in, right?
    A:
    Unfortunately, no. We would love to be able to say that’s the case, but remember that there are still all those automatic bids. Plus, the NCAA doesn’t agree with us as to who the best at-large teams are.

    Q: Can you explain more about the various playoff selection/regional ranking criteria?
    A:
    Absolutely. We have a whole section of our FAQ devoted to the NCAA Tournament, with that and game dates and the list of conferences with automatic bids.

    Q: I have a question you haven’t answered. What do I do?
    A:
    E-mail info@d3sports.com and/or post below in the comments section.

    The first D3hoops.com Classic

    Whitworth

    Dave McHugh, Gordon Mann and I are headed to Las Vegas this week for the second iteration of the D3hoops.com Classic. Gordon and Dave live in the Mid-Atlantic snow zone, so we hope they get there.

    But this isn’t the first D3hoops.com Classic. A decade ago at this time, we were hosting a D3hoops.com Classic ourselves at Catholic U., in Washington, D.C. Mike Lonergan, who was then the men’s basketball coach and is now the head coach at Vermont, approached me a few months earlier after having lost a title sponsor for his holiday tournament, asking if we would step in for the sum of $2,000. Catholic won the tournament, with Hobart, Plymouth State and Roger Williams. Catholic went on to win the national title that year. So there’s precedent!

    Somewhere I still have a t-shirt or two. We broadcast the games on the Internet — audio only, since this was 2000, but it was not particularly widespread at the time. And we still recorded games on cassette tape at the time. For a couple years thereafter, we got emails from schools asking if we were going to do another one, but it was a one-time shot.

    Those were great times for us. A year earlier we had launched D3football.com and it was a great success. But the dot-com crash was about to hit, and that $2,000 nearly bankrupted us. This time, the tournament is run by Sport Tours International, it’s in Las Vegas (30 degrees warmer than Minneapolis!) and we’re going to have three Top 25 men’s teams and one Top 25 women’s team in the building.

    That is, if they all get out of the snow zone themselves! Coverage starts today with No. 4 UW-Stevens Point taking on No. 20 Ramapo. You can get more coverage of the Classic, including live video, on our Classic page and we will post stories and such throughout.

    Insider: The beginning of the end

    Justin RileyChapman forward Justin Riley joins us for a second season as a blogger, after a year in which he helped lead the Panthers to the second round of the NCAA Tournament. His first blog post of the season follows.

    It was a sunny spring day when I first walked onto Chapman University’s campus. I had informed the head coach the previous day that I would be coming to play open gym with the team. As I roamed the campus looking for the coach’s office, I had a feeling that the coaching staff didn’t care too much that I was coming. No one was there to greet me when I arrived; no one picked up my phone calls. Nothing.

    Eventually, I asked a random student where the coach’s offices were and luckily he pointed me in the right direction. On the walk there, the uneasiness I felt turned into anger. For the first time in my basketball career, I felt that I didn’t really matter. After 15 minutes of searching, asking, and wondering where the coach was, I finally found an assistant coach and headed to the gym. As I was preparing to lace up my shoes and take the court, the head coach walked in with a recruit and his parents.

    At that moment my feelings were reaffirmed—I didn’t really matter.

    I took the court with an added sense of motivation to prove not only to myself, but to the coaching staff, that I was the best player in that gym.

    And not to my surprise, the coaching staff agreed. And the rest is history!

    Three and half years later, I stand toe-to-toe with my teammate of eight years, Griffin Ramme, ready to lead Chapman University to another successful season and NCAA Division III tournament bid. At the end of last season, we had our doubts of how good we would be. Graduating three seniors, two of whom were four-year starters, is not an easy reality to overcome, yet we remained optimistic. Individual workouts, weightlifting sessions, adult league games and basketball camps filled up the summer; but an uneasy feeling of our team’s future still loomed.

    School started.

    Open gym started.

    Our team would be composed of those who showed up at the gym every afternoon at 1:00 to showcase their “new and improved” abilities, myself included.

    With over a month of intense 5-on-5 games and team practices rapidly approaching, I still wasn’t convinced that we could duplicate last season’s performance.

    October 15 was here.

    There was nothing more anyone could do. The countless hours spent in the gym boiled down to this very moment: practice.

    Practice, practice, and more practice.

    Was my senior season going to be a memorable one filled with great experiences, or a year of rebuilding highlighted with struggle and tough defeats? I can’t answer this question in its entirety, but I can confidently say that the once uneasy feeling dancing in my stomach no longer exists. After the first few days of practice, it was clear there was more talent in the gym compared to last year. And the only thing missing was exactly that: practice.

    Three weeks into my senior campaign, we stand with a 6-1 record, with our only loss coming to last year’s NAIA Division 1 runner up, Azusa Pacific University. This past weekend, we claimed the Lee Fulmer Tournament Championship for the second consecutive season, defeating Redlands in the finals. December marks a crucial month for us as we have six Division III games, five of which are against teams in the West region.

    I never realized how quickly four seasons would go by, but as a co-captain and senior leader, I am excited for this final collegiate journey I will take with my teammates and only hope that we remain positive, practice hard, and stay focused on our goal to have the opportunity to play again in March.