Immediate thoughts on Thursday’s games

This is Take two, as my initial post was eaten by the “back” key on my web browser. That’s what I get for gloating about initially writing about Super Sleeper St. Thomas ‘(say that fast) upset win over Gustavus on Wednesday.

It was a nice night for buzzer beaters…Ryan Flynn of WPI got his second in a row as the Engineers have shown a knack for pulling out close games late. Carroll (Wisc.) and Salve Regina also got nice buzzer-beater wins over Concordia (Wisc.) and Rhode Island College respectively. Salve’s win is a credibility victory for the CCC over an RIC team that some have told me is going to pretty good this season. Great individual performance by Salve’s Matt Grendal (25 points and a school-record 24 rebounds), whose putback at the horn was the decisive shot.

Anyone out there see this Tufts-Plymouth State game? 100-97 win for the Jumbos. Must have been a good one. Middlebury tied its best start in school history by rolling Johnson State. Apparently it’s not just a hockey school any more. More on the Panthers next week.

I’m not terribly surprised that Richard Stockton beat Catholic on the women’s side. I saw Stockton lose to Springfield last season and was impressed with their depth and caliber of play. The Ospreys seem to have the inside track in the NJAC this year. Top performance came from Notre Dame’s Catherine Vecchioni, who had 30 points and 22 rebounds in a triple-overtime loss to Goucher. Vecchioni has had a knack for putting up good numbers in big games. She had a similar such effort in last year’s AWCC title game loss to Chestnut Hill.

Yes, we cover women too

I just thought I would throw this out there because I know people are thinking it. We do still cover women’s basketball. Although our traffic runs about two-thirds men’s basketball to one-third women’s, we try to feature more of a 60/40 split on the front page. We’ve had a run lately of men’s stories but it’s just a coincidence.

Meanwhile, I would hope more Division III women’s basketball fans become more active supporters of te coverage on our site. Let us know what you think. You’re a very silent group, but we do care about you.

Rant: Foul Discrepancies!

At almost any basketball game in the nation, you are bound to hear fans and even coaches yell and complain about fouls. This isn’t unexpected.

But, when they start complaining about the foul discrepancies between the two teams that is when I roll my eyes.

Apparently, many people feel that referees should call games tit for tat… not necessarily fairly!

You know… eye for an eye… hand-check for a hand-check.

In other words, the amount of fouls called on team should equal the amount called on another team.

If you haven’t seen the equation for this theorem, it looks a little like this:
(Team A Fouls) +/- 2 = (Team B Fouls) +/- 2

Now, if only the refs had that equation written on their hands… right?!

Give me a break!

Does anyone consider the situation, the teams, the game, and other very obvious – usually visible – facts?

Just because a team commits a foul does not mean the other team should be whistled the next time down the court. The point of the game isn’t so both teams make to the bonus free-throws at the same time!

There are many situations and games that won’t allow this to happen.
Is a team being aggressive defensively… or on offense?
What if a team is playing a man-to-man defense… or a zone?
How about that team that is running an offense that passes the ball around the perimeter instead of cutting through the lanes and driving to the basket?
And don’t forget… there could be a team out there that is simply undisciplined or lacks the experience on the court.

But, that certainly didn’t matter at a game I was at recently. At one point in the first half Team A had 13 team fouls to Team B’s 4. Sounds outrageous on paper and the fans – along with Team A’s coach – certainly pointed this out to the refs… numerous times.

But they weren’t really paying attention to why the fouls were being called in such a – I dare to say – lopsided way.

Team B was playing a 2-3 or 3-2 zone the entire half and Team A simply wasn’t attacking it. And every time Team A got the ball in the middle, Team B had a player already parked there. But that wouldn’t stop a player from Team A from elbowing, hip-checking, or bowling their way in the paint.

(They apparently couldn’t hit a five-foot jumper… they needed that lay-up, no matter who was in their way.)

Whistle! Offensive foul!

“WHAT!!! Are you kidding ME!!! You have called the 14th foul on the team to there four… there was NO WAY that was a charge!!!”

On the other end of the court, Team A was playing an extremely aggressive, in-your-face, man-to-man defense. But instead of backing away timidly, Team B attacked right back! They cut through the paint, set picks, drove the lane, and weren’t afraid of the contact. That resulted in many hand-checks, blocks, and pushing calls to be called on Team A.

Whistle! Hand-Check!

“WHAT!!! Seriously?! You are calling a hand-check on our player? But that is our 15th foul and you know the other team has GOT to be fouling our guys TOO!”

From my point of view, it really wasn’t that surprising. It wasn’t like the refs weren’t calling Team B for the same fouls. Those fouls simply weren’t taking place because Team A sat back on offense against a very simple zone defense.

How is a ref going to call hand-check or a blocking foul, if a player doesn’t even get close to the defender – or visa versa?

Team A was getting called for more fouls because they were initiating contact on defense and refused to attack on offense. All they had to do was attack the zone (and not when the player is camped out and in between them and the basket) and trust me; the fouls would have been called.

But, the fans screamed, the coach complained, and I got a headache.

All I am asking it that next time, before screaming at a ref to even the foul count… figure out if that is even possible. You have to understand that in certain situations, fouls simply can’t be called… no matter how much you are pleading for a whistle.

Taking the time to actually watch a game and learn from it might make you realize that your team is being dumb on the court or playing in a way that contributes to more fouls being called.

Refs certainly are not going to get all the calls right, but don’t ask them to make it up… because the number doesn’t look “fair” on the board.

The point of the refs isn’t to make the scoreboard even.

Immediate thoughts on Monday night

Short schedule, more interesting on the women’s side than the men’s.

Crystal Hoewisch scored 34 points, 22 of them in the second half and the game-winning shot with three seconds left as Carroll’s women knocked off UW-Stevens Point 90-88. Hoewisch shot 13-for-16 from the floor and Krista Rode added 29 points on 10-for-14 shooting. The rest of the team was 10-for-29. UW-Stevens Point’s starting five for the night had started a grand total of one game entering the evening. The Pointers’ top three scorers came off the bench.

Odd.

Carleton beat St. Benedict at home last night. Carleton has lost just one home game to the Blazers since we started tracking all results in 2002, and that was in last year’s MIAC tournament.

On the men’s side, two of the more interesting games were snowed out: Hood at No. 6 York (Pa.) and Richard Stockton at Lincoln. Among games that actually took place, Augustana remained unbeaten by topping Rockford, and Carroll improved to 5-0 by winning at Carthage behind 26 points from Nate Drury.

No report from Wesley/Neumann. Perhaps our comment-poster from yesterday who was so high on Wesley would be kind enough to inform us in some official capacity as to whether that game got played or snowed out.

Immediate thoughts on Saturday

Some unexpectedly tight games today. Illinois Wesleyan edged Chicago, Wooster got a last-second basket to beat Earlham. Even tighter, of course, was Carnegie Mellon’s win against Rochester. Mary Hardin-Baylor the same against Mississippi College. St. Thomas edged Macalester 72-68.

The good: Coast Guard rolled up a 29-0 run against Kings Point in the basketball equivalent of the Army/Navy game, winning 97-76. The Bears shot 69.7% from the floor. … Alma’s men beat D-II Lake Superior State. … Nice win for Clark’s women over Salem State. … Elmhurst men knocked off Hanover and Chris Martin wasn’t one of the top two scorers.

The bad: Don’t have any details on Dickinson/Washington College on the women’s side but at 49-43 can’t have been a great game.

The ugly: Curry’s men lost at Christopher Newport because it had six men on the floor with under 30 seconds left. The two CNU free throws allowed the Captains to take a 65-64 lead en route to a 68-65 win.

So what does this mean? Catholic women beat Scranton. Mary Washington beat Catholic. Catholic beat Marymount. This could mean Mary Washington is really good. We’ll see.

We’ll leave the rest to you.