NCAA’s 2011 regional rankings, Week 1

The first men’s and women’s regional rankings of the 2010-11 season have been released. Scroll down for women’s rankings.

Need to know more about the regional rankings process and what they mean? Check our blog post. Need to know more about the NCAA Tournament? Check out our NCAA Tournament FAQ.

The first record is overall record, followed by in-region record.

Men’s rankings
Atlantic Region

1 Ramapo 16-4 15-2
2 Kean 14-6 13-4
3 Staten Island 14-4 13-3
4 St. Joseph’s (L.I.) 15-2 13-2
5 Montclair State 16-4 10-4

East Region
1 Oswego State 14-3 14-3
2 Ithaca 15-4 14-4
3 Rochester 14-4 13-3
4 Hobart 14-4 14-3
5 Plattsburgh State 12-5 11-3
6 Stevens 12-5 12-5

Great Lakes Region
1 Wooster 19-0 16-0
2 Hope 14-5 10-1
3 Wabash 16-3 15-3
4 Marietta 17-2 14-2
5 Wittenberg 14-5 11-3
6 Penn State-Behrend 16-2 16-1

Mid-Atlantic Region
1 Elizabethtown 15-3 14-3
2 La Roche 17-2 16-2
3 Wesley 13-6 12-1
4 St. Mary’s (Md.) 15-4 12-2
5 Cabrini 13-4 13-4
6 Keystone 14-3 14-3
7 DeSales 14-5 12-5
8 Gwynedd-Mercy 13-4 12-3
9 Franklin and Marshall 15-4 14-4

Midwest Region
1 Augustana (Ill.) 19-0 18-0
2 Concordia (Wis.) 16-2 15-2
3 Illinois Wesleyan 14-5 13-5
4 Edgewood 13-6 13-4
5 Hanover 13-5 13-5
6 St. Norbert 15-3 15-3
7 Anderson (Ind.) 14-5 12-4
8 Milwaukee Engineering 14-5 13-5

South Region
1 Virginia Wesleyan 18-1 14-1
2 Randolph-Macon 17-3 15-3
3 Ferrum 18-2 16-2
4 Centre 15-3 13-3
5 Mary Hardin-Baylor 15-4 15-4
6 Texas-Dallas 14-5 13-4
7 Emory 14-4 14-4
8 East Texas Baptist 13-5 12-5

Northeast Region
1 Williams 19-1 17-1
2 Middlebury 16-1 14-1
3 Amherst 18-0 17-0
4 Western Connecticut State 17-2 16-2
5 WPI 17-3 17-2
6 Becker 16-3 16-3
7 Elms 13-5 11-4
8 Eastern Connecticut State 13-5 11-4
9 Brandeis 13-4 13-4
10 Bowdoin 12-5 12-5
11 Rhode Island College 12-7 12-7

West Region
1 Whitworth 19-0 19-0
2 St. Thomas 17-1 16-1
3 UW-River Falls 18-2 16-1
4 UW-Stevens Point 17-3 16-3
5 Chapman 17-3 14-1
6 Lewis and Clark 14-5 12-5
7 Gustavus Adolphus 12-6 11-5
8 Carleton 11-7 11-5
9 Augsburg 12-6 12-6

For women’s basketball, the committee ranks the top six eligible teams from each region, with the exception of the Northeast region, which ranks 10 teams.

The first record is in-region record, followed by overall record.

Atlantic Region
1. Kean 14-0 17-2
2. Mount Saint Mary 17-2 17-2
3. William Paterson 15-3 16-3
4. Gallaudet 16-0 18-0
5. Richard Stockton 12-5 13-6
6. Baruch 15-3 16-3

Central Region
1. Illinois Wesleyan 12-3 15-4
2. UW-Stevens Point 18-2 18-2
3. UW-Whitewater 13-3 16-3
4. Chicago 15-3 15-3
5. Washington U. 12-2 15-3
6. Millikin 14-4 14-5

East Region
1. Medaille 17-2 17-2
2. Rochester 12-4 14-4
3. Geneseo State 13-1 15-2
4. New Paltz State 11-5 11-7
5. Oneonta State 14-2 15-3
6. Cortland State 13-4 13-4

Great Lakes Region
1. Thomas More 18-0 19-0
2. Denison 17-0 19-0
3. Calvin 13-0 17-3
4. Hanover 16-1 17-1
5. Hope 15-1 18-1
6. St. Vincent 15-2 17-2

Mid-Atlantic Region
1. Lebanon Valley 15-1 18-1
2. Johns Hopkins 16-3 16-3
3. Juniata 14-3 14-6
4. Widener 13-4 14-5
5. Messiah 11-4 12-6
6. Scranton 12-3 14-5

Northeast Region
1. Amherst 18-1 19-1
2. Williams 17-1 19-1
3. Babson 17-0 19-0
4. Bowdoin 15-3 15-4
5. Western Connecticut State 14-2 16-3
6. Bates 14-4 16-5
7. Eastern Connecticut State 13-4 13-6
8. Colby 12-4 14-4
9. Southern Maine 13-4 13-6
10. Tufts 14-3 15-3

South Region
1. Greensboro 17-0 18-0
2. Christopher Newport 16-2 18-2
3. Louisiana College 15-1 17-1
4. Randolph-Macon 14-2 14-4
5. Roanoke 11-3 11-4
6. Texas-Dallas 15-4 16-4

West Region
1. Coe 16-2 17-2
2. Lewis and Clark 11-2 15-4
3. Simpson 15-2 17-3
4. St. Benedict 14-3 16-3
5. Wartburg 16-3 17-3
6. Puget Sound 12-3 15-4

Playoff primer: Pool B, Pool C

From now until the end of the regular season you may well see a lot of Division III buzzwords floating about on our front page, here in the Daily Dose and on our message boards. Pool A, Pool B, Pool C, OWP, OOWP … what do those all mean?

  • First weekly NCAA regional rankings posted
  • Pool A, Pool B and Pool C are the labels given to groups (also known as Pools) of bids awarded to the playoffs. The field is 61 men’s teams and 64 women’s teams culminating in the Final Four and national title games in Salem, Va. (men) and Bloomington, Ill. (women).

    Understanding Pool A is fairly simple — let’s just pretend that ‘A’ stands for automatic. Those are the automatic bids that are awarded. There are 42 conferences with men’s automatic bids and 43 conferences with women’s automatic bids. Every conference other than the UAA awards its automatic bid to the winner of a conference tournament.

    If you are not in one of those conferences, there is one bid set aside for you, which is what’s referred to as Pool B. The best team out of that group, which includes independents and (for men only) the Great South Athletic Conference teams, gets a bid as well.

    Every eligible team not already selected is dropped into Pool C, which consists of 18 men’s and 20 women’s at-large bids. At-large bids are determined using the NCAA’s criteria, which includes regional winning percentage, strength of schedule, head-to-head competition, results against common opponents and results against regionally ranked teams.

    If your conference has an automatic bid and your team doesn’t win it, then you are only eligible for Pool C bids. If your conference doesn’t have an automatic bid, you are eligible for Pool B or, if you don’t make that cut, Pool C.

    Q: Why is the women’s tournament 64 but the men’s only 61?
    A:
    There are more schools with women’s basketball teams than men’s basketball teams. As more schools join Division III (or more women’s-only schools go co-ed), the men’s tournament will grow to 64. In fact, we only need one more eligible team to get a 62-team men’s basketball NCAA Tournament field.

    Q: How can my team guarantee it will get into the playoffs?
    A:
    Win your conference’s automatic bid. There’s no guarantees otherwise.

    Q: If the two best teams are in the same region, will they be placed in separate brackets?
    A:
    This is at least possible, but highly unlikely. They don’t seed this tournament like a D-I tournament, unfortunately. Teams are placed in groups according to geography and seeded, though keeping teams from having to travel 500 miles in the first round is more important to the NCAA than maintaining proper matchups. We can expect from history that the women’s basketball committee will do its best to separate the top teams. The history in men’s basketball is mixed at best.

    Q: There are a lot of criteria to go through. How can I tell where my team stands?
    A:
    The NCAA releases regional rankings over the final weeks of the regular season, starting today. However, being No. 6 in one region doesn’t necessarily mean you’re ahead of a team that’s No. 7 in one of the other seven.

    Q: So if I’m ranked seventh in these rankings, I’m in the playoffs?
    A:
    No. There are still the 42/43 automatic bids. They’ll all get in first. Take the automatic bids out of the rankings (and keep in mind some conferences don’t have anyone in these rankings) and one Pool B team, then the remaining 18/20 get in.

    Q: We’re ranked in the D3hoops.com Top 25. Sin
    ce the bracket has more than 60 teams, we should be in, right?
    A:
    Unfortunately, no. We would love to be able to say that’s the case, but remember that there are still all those automatic bids. Plus, the NCAA doesn’t agree with us as to who the best at-large teams are.

    Q: Can you explain more about the various playoff selection/regional ranking criteria?
    A:
    Absolutely. We have a whole section of our FAQ devoted to the NCAA Tournament, with that and game dates and the list of conferences with automatic bids.

    Q: I have a question you haven’t answered. What do I do?
    A:
    E-mail info@d3sports.com and/or post below in the comments section.

    The final word on La Sierra

    La Sierra’s long trip through the provisional membership process, trying to become a Division III member, took a wrong turn this past fall and finally has come to an end. The NCAA’s Division III membership committee reported that “In regards to La Sierra University, the institution that was instructed to rejoin the process as a year one institution, it is trying to do the right thing and attempting to understand what it takes to be a Division III institution.”

    La Sierra, in Southern California, could have been through the four-year process and become an active member of Division III by now, in a spot of the country that could desperately use more Division III schools. Instead, the school has joined the NAIA, according to a release this week.

    It isn’t easy to become a Division III school. Many of the schools that start the process are not fully prepared to do so, especially those that have to add sports, in some cases several, to make the minimum. In this case, La Sierra has finally washed out of the process.

    Taking a whack at Pool C

    Last night I started running numbers with the intent of producing a full bracket, but was unable to do so before having to give up and get some sleep. Sleep is precious this time of year — way too much work to do and not enough time to do it.

    But I got far enough through it to generate something useful, and that was my Pool C rankings. Here’s were I saw the teams shaking out if the season ended Wednesday night:

    Pool C
    1 UW-Stevens Point
    2 Middlebury
    3 Guilford
    4 Virginia Wesleyan
    5 Wheaton (Ill.)
    6 Lycoming
    7 Richard Stockton
    8 Illinois Wesleyan
    9 Colby
    10 Brandeis
    11 Randolph-Macon
    12 Rutgers-Newark
    13 Messiah
    14 Oneonta State
    15 Mary Hardin-Baylor
    16 Ithaca
    17 Augsburg
    18 York (Pa.)
    19 Defiance

    After that, the teams on the board were Ramapo, NYU, Calvin, Wesley, Western Connecticut, DePauw, UW-La Crosse. Augustana was next behind Defiance.

    To do this, of course, I had to pick champions in a bunch of conferences, to determine who the Pool C teams would be. Mostly these are top seeds, or top teams in the regional rankings from each conference.

    Pool A Projected winner
    AMCC Medaille
    ASC Texas-Dallas
    CAC St. Mary’s (Md.)
    CC Franklin and Marshall
    CSAC Cabrini
    CUNYAC York (N.Y.)
    CCIW Carthage
    CCC Gordon
    E8 St. John Fisher
    GNAC Albertus Magnus
    HCAC Anderson
    IIAC Central
    LAND Merchant Marine
    LL St. Lawrence
    LEC Rhode Island College
    MASCAC Bridgewater State
    MIAA Hope
    MAC-C Albright
    MAC-F DeSales
    MWC St. Norbert
    MIAC St. Thomas
    NESCAC Williams
    NEWMAC MIT
    NJAC William Paterson
    NAC Maine-Farmington
    NATHC Aurora
    NCAC Wooster
    NEAC SUNYIT
    NWC Whitworth
    OAC John Carroll
    ODAC Eastern Mennonite
    PAC Thomas More
    SLIAC Westminster (Mo.)
    SKY SUNY-Old Westbury
    SCIAC Claremont-Mudd-Scripps
    SCAC Austin
    SUNYAC Plattsburgh State
    UAA Washington U.
    USAC North Carolina Wesleyan
    WIAC UW-Whitewater

    It’s a rough first draft, and nothing ever accounts for conference tournament upsets. But the further down you are on the Pool C list, the less safe you are is someone on the Pool A list gets upset.

    2010 Regional Ranking, Week 4

    The fourth women’s regional rankings of the 2009-10 season have been released. We are waiting on the men’s.

    Remember there are three ways a game can be classified as in region.

    Men’s rankings

    Atlantic Region In-Region Record Overall Record
    1.William Paterson 22-2 23-2
    2.Merchant Marine 20-4 21-4
    3.Rutgers-Newark 16-5 20-6
    4.Richard Stockton 19-5 19-6
    5.Ramapo 17-7 18-8

    East Region In-Region Record Overall Record
    1.St. John Fisher 20-4 21-4
    2.Plattsburgh State 17-6 18-7
    3.Oneonta State 19-5 20-5
    4.Ithaca 15-6 18-7
    5.Medaille 20-4 21-4
    6.New York University 15-8 16-8

    Great Lakes Region In-Region Record Overall Record
    1.John Carroll 17-5 19-5
    2.Wooster 20-4 20-5
    3.Hope 13-3 18-7
    4.Calvin 13-3 17-8
    5.Thomas More 19-6 19-6
    6.Wilmington 17-6 18-7

    Middle Atlantic Region In-Region Record Overall Record
    1.St. Mary’s (Md.) 20-3 22-3
    2.Albright 18-5 19-5
    3.Franklin and Marshall 21-4 21-4
    4.Cabrini 23-2 23-2
    5.Lycoming 16-5 20-5
    6.DeSales 19-4 20-5
    7.Messiah 15-5 16-8
    8.York (Pa.) 18-6 19-6
    9.Wesley 14-5 17-7

    Midwest Region In-Region Record Overall Record
    1.Washington U. 19-2 22-2
    2.Carthage 16-3 20-5
    3.Wheaton (Ill.) 17-7 18-7
    4.Illinois Wesleyan 18-6 19-6
    5.St. Norbert 19-3 20-3
    6.Anderson 19-4 21-4
    7.Defiance 18-5 20-5
    8.Augustana 16-8 16-9

    Northeast Region In-Region Record Overall Record
    1.Williams 22-0 24-1
    2.Middlebury 19-2 23-2
    3.MIT 21-2 22-3
    4.Colby 17-4 19-5
    5.Brandeis 18-6 18-6
    6.Rhode Island College 18-7 18-7
    7.Bridgewater State 16-5 17-7
    8.Gordon 20-4 21-4
    9.Western Connecticut 17-6 18-6
    10.WPI 17-6 18-6
    11.Eastern Connecticut 17-8 17-8

    South Region In-Region Record Overall Record
    1.Eastern Mennonite 17-2 21-3
    2.Guilford 23-2 23-2
    3.Texas-Dallas 20-3 21-4
    4.Virginia Wesleyan 19-4 21-4
    5.Randolph-Macon 14-5 20-5
    6.Maryville (Tenn.) 14-3 21-4
    7.Austin 19-6 19-6
    8.Mary Hardin-Baylor 19-5 19-6

    West Region In-Region Record Overall Record
    1.UW-Whitewater 21-4 21-4
    2.St. Thomas 20-2 23-2
    3.Whitworth 21-2 23-2
    4.UW-Stevens Point 20-4 21-4
    5.Central 19-2 21-4
    6.Chapman 17-1 23-2
    7.UW-La Crosse 16-7 17-8
    8.Claremont–Mudd-Scripps 15-4 19-5
    9.Augsburg 17-7 18-7

    Women’s rankings

    Through games of Sunday, Feb. 21, 2010.

    Atlantic Region Record Overall Record
    1. Kean 23-0 24-1
    2. William Paterson 24-1 24-1
    3. Marymount 21-1 24-1
    4. Mary Washington 19-3 20-4
    5. Farmingdale State 23-1 23-1
    6. Mount Saint Mary 20-4 21-4

    Central Region Record Overall Record
    1. Illinois Wesleyan 21-1 24-1
    2. Carthage 19-2 22-3
    3. Washington U. 19-2 22-2
    4. Chicago 19-5 19-5
    5. UW-Whitewater 18-5 19-6
    6. St. Norbert 20-3 20-3

    East Region Record Overall Record
    1. Ithaca 21-2 21-4
    2. Rochester 16-6 18-6
    3. Medaille 22-1 23-2
    4. Cortland State 21-3 22-3
    5. St. Lawrence 18-6 18-6
    6. Skidmore 19-3 20-4

    Great Lakes Region Record Overall Record
    1. Hope 21-0 24-1
    2. Thomas More 22-2 22-3
    3. Washington and Jefferson 22-2 22-3
    4. DePauw 19-2 22-3
    5. Calvin 17-2 22-3
    6. Capital 17-6 18-7

    Mid-Atlantic Region Record Overall Record
    1. Moravian 23-2 23-2
    2. Muhlenberg 20-4 20-4
    3. Lebanon Valley 22-2 22-3
    4. Messiah 19-3 21-4
    5. Scranton 19-4 21-4
    6. McDaniel 18-6 18-6

    Northeast Region Record Overall Record
    1. Amherst 25-0 25-0
    2. Colby 19-3 22-3
    3. Bowdoin 17-5 20-5
    4. Tufts 17-4 20-5
    5. Williams 18-6 18-7
    6. Emmanuel 17-5 19-5
    7. Western Connecticut 19-5 20-5
    8. Eastern Connecticut 17-8 17-8
    9. Southern Maine 18-7 18-7
    10. Babson 22-3 22-3

    South Region Record Overall Record
    1. Christopher Newport 24-0 25-0
    2. Roanoke 20-2 22-2
    3. Louisiana College 18-2 21-2
    4. Mary Hardin-Baylor 19-5 20-5
    5. Howard Payne 20-5 20-5
    6. Texas-Dallas 18-6 19-6

    West Region Record Overall Record
    1. George Fox 17-1 23-2
    2. Puget Sound 17-2 22-3
    3. Redlands 19-4 20-5
    4. Gustavus Adolphus 20-4 20-5
    5. Coe 17-7 18-7
    6. St. Benedict 20-5 20-5