<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Final public NCAA regional rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.d3blogs.com/d3hoops/2009/02/25/final-public-ncaa-regional-rankings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.d3blogs.com/d3hoops/2009/02/25/final-public-ncaa-regional-rankings/</link>
	<description>The daily dish on Division III basketball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:53:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vhwon</title>
		<link>http://www.d3blogs.com/d3hoops/2009/02/25/final-public-ncaa-regional-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-4707</link>
		<dc:creator>vhwon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://d3blogs.com/d3hoops/?p=645#comment-4707</guid>
		<description>Curious why McMurry is ranked 6th in the South and Mary Hardin-Baylor is not ranked. UMHB beat McMurry twice and they have similiar records.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious why McMurry is ranked 6th in the South and Mary Hardin-Baylor is not ranked. UMHB beat McMurry twice and they have similiar records.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cookie34</title>
		<link>http://www.d3blogs.com/d3hoops/2009/02/25/final-public-ncaa-regional-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-4705</link>
		<dc:creator>cookie34</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://d3blogs.com/d3hoops/?p=645#comment-4705</guid>
		<description>Can a case be made for Montclair State?  They went 20 - 3 after an 0 - 3 start, won their division, played competitively against Stockton, beat other ranked regional Atlantic teams St. Joe&#039;s (LI) and Willy P (twice), had won 9 straight before losing in the league semis by 1 on a &quot;long distance 3&quot; by Rutger-Nwk, - whom they had beaten twice during the season.  As of today, their strength of schedule is a competitive 58.  Is their most recent lost that devasting for a Pool C bid?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can a case be made for Montclair State?  They went 20 &#8211; 3 after an 0 &#8211; 3 start, won their division, played competitively against Stockton, beat other ranked regional Atlantic teams St. Joe&#8217;s (LI) and Willy P (twice), had won 9 straight before losing in the league semis by 1 on a &#8220;long distance 3&#8243; by Rutger-Nwk, &#8211; whom they had beaten twice during the season.  As of today, their strength of schedule is a competitive 58.  Is their most recent lost that devasting for a Pool C bid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Mann</title>
		<link>http://www.d3blogs.com/d3hoops/2009/02/25/final-public-ncaa-regional-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-4704</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://d3blogs.com/d3hoops/?p=645#comment-4704</guid>
		<description>The Atlantic didn&#039;t get a Pool C for the men&#039;s tournament last year so there&#039;s precedent for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Atlantic didn&#8217;t get a Pool C for the men&#8217;s tournament last year so there&#8217;s precedent for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.d3blogs.com/d3hoops/2009/02/25/final-public-ncaa-regional-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-4703</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://d3blogs.com/d3hoops/?p=645#comment-4703</guid>
		<description>Women’s regional rankings
Records listed are in-region record, followed by overall record.

Atlantic Region 
1. York (Pa.) 24-1 24-1
2. Mt. St. Mary (N.Y.) 21-3 21-4
3. TCNJ 20-4 21-4
4. Kean 18-5 20-6
5. Marymount (Va.) 19-4 20-5
6. Mary Washington 18-5 20-5

Central Region 
1. Ill. Wesleyan 21-0 24-0
2. Washington-St. Louis 18-4 20-4
3. Wis.-Stevens Point 21-3 22-3
4. Wis.-Whitewater 20-3 22-3
5. Wis.-Eau Claire 17-4 21-4
6. St. Norbert 18-2 19-4

East Region 
1. Rochester 21-3 21-3
2. New York U. 20-4 20-4
3. Cortland St. 21-3 22-3
4. Union (N.Y.) 18-4 18-6
5. Oneonta St. 17-4 19-5
6. Ithaca 16-6 17-8

Great Lakes Region 
1. Hope 18-1 22-1
2. Thomas More 19-2 23-2
3. DePauw 15-3 21-4
4. Wash. &amp; Jeff. 18-3 22-3
5. Transylvania 18-3 20-5
6. Capital 18-4 18-5

Mid-Atlantic Region 
1. Scranton 21-4 21-4
2. Moravian 18-5 20-5
3. Muhlenberg 22-3 22-3
4. DeSales 21-4 21-4
5. Messiah 20-3 22-3
6. Alvernia 16-6 17-8

Northeast Region 
1. Amherst 23-1 24-1
2. Tufts 21-3 21-3
3. Brandeis 16-6 17-6
4. Bowdoin 20-4 21-4
5. Eastern Conn. St. 23-2 23-2
6. Western Conn. St. 19-4 20-4
7. Southern Me. 18-5 19-6
8. Keene St. 17-6 19-6

South Region 
1. Oglethorpe 17-3 22-3
2. Greensboro 23-0 24-1
3. Texas-Dallas 21-3 21-4
4. Mississippi Col. 21-3 22-3
5. Roanoke 20-3 22-3
6. Randolph-Macon 17-4 20-5

West Region 
1. George Fox 20-0 25-0
2. St. Benedict 22-3 22-3
3. Simpson 18-3 22-3
4. Concordia-M’head 17-5 18-7
5. St. Thomas (Minn.) 18-7 18-7
6. Redlands 18-6 19-6</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Women’s regional rankings<br />
Records listed are in-region record, followed by overall record.</p>
<p>Atlantic Region<br />
1. York (Pa.) 24-1 24-1<br />
2. Mt. St. Mary (N.Y.) 21-3 21-4<br />
3. TCNJ 20-4 21-4<br />
4. Kean 18-5 20-6<br />
5. Marymount (Va.) 19-4 20-5<br />
6. Mary Washington 18-5 20-5</p>
<p>Central Region<br />
1. Ill. Wesleyan 21-0 24-0<br />
2. Washington-St. Louis 18-4 20-4<br />
3. Wis.-Stevens Point 21-3 22-3<br />
4. Wis.-Whitewater 20-3 22-3<br />
5. Wis.-Eau Claire 17-4 21-4<br />
6. St. Norbert 18-2 19-4</p>
<p>East Region<br />
1. Rochester 21-3 21-3<br />
2. New York U. 20-4 20-4<br />
3. Cortland St. 21-3 22-3<br />
4. Union (N.Y.) 18-4 18-6<br />
5. Oneonta St. 17-4 19-5<br />
6. Ithaca 16-6 17-8</p>
<p>Great Lakes Region<br />
1. Hope 18-1 22-1<br />
2. Thomas More 19-2 23-2<br />
3. DePauw 15-3 21-4<br />
4. Wash. &amp; Jeff. 18-3 22-3<br />
5. Transylvania 18-3 20-5<br />
6. Capital 18-4 18-5</p>
<p>Mid-Atlantic Region<br />
1. Scranton 21-4 21-4<br />
2. Moravian 18-5 20-5<br />
3. Muhlenberg 22-3 22-3<br />
4. DeSales 21-4 21-4<br />
5. Messiah 20-3 22-3<br />
6. Alvernia 16-6 17-8</p>
<p>Northeast Region<br />
1. Amherst 23-1 24-1<br />
2. Tufts 21-3 21-3<br />
3. Brandeis 16-6 17-6<br />
4. Bowdoin 20-4 21-4<br />
5. Eastern Conn. St. 23-2 23-2<br />
6. Western Conn. St. 19-4 20-4<br />
7. Southern Me. 18-5 19-6<br />
8. Keene St. 17-6 19-6</p>
<p>South Region<br />
1. Oglethorpe 17-3 22-3<br />
2. Greensboro 23-0 24-1<br />
3. Texas-Dallas 21-3 21-4<br />
4. Mississippi Col. 21-3 22-3<br />
5. Roanoke 20-3 22-3<br />
6. Randolph-Macon 17-4 20-5</p>
<p>West Region<br />
1. George Fox 20-0 25-0<br />
2. St. Benedict 22-3 22-3<br />
3. Simpson 18-3 22-3<br />
4. Concordia-M’head 17-5 18-7<br />
5. St. Thomas (Minn.) 18-7 18-7<br />
6. Redlands 18-6 19-6</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.d3blogs.com/d3hoops/2009/02/25/final-public-ncaa-regional-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-4702</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://d3blogs.com/d3hoops/?p=645#comment-4702</guid>
		<description>Nothing for the women, yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing for the women, yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.d3blogs.com/d3hoops/2009/02/25/final-public-ncaa-regional-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-4701</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://d3blogs.com/d3hoops/?p=645#comment-4701</guid>
		<description>My first thought about the men&#039;s numbers is that the East Regional Committee has injected some sanily into the rankings.

We saw a recent running of Pabegg&#039;s numbers giving Hamilton the #2 slot in the East and going ahead of conference leading St Lawrence.

The second thing that strikes me is that the Atlantic Region might not get a Pool C bid, if Richard Stockton gets the Pool A.  Montclair State and Willy Pat lost semifinal matches in the NJAC last night.

Carnegie Mellon goes to Rochester on Saturday.  I think that this is a must-win game for both teams at the Palestra.  CMU can consolidate their Pool C chance.  In fact, this game may be for the last UAA Pool C bid, itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first thought about the men&#8217;s numbers is that the East Regional Committee has injected some sanily into the rankings.</p>
<p>We saw a recent running of Pabegg&#8217;s numbers giving Hamilton the #2 slot in the East and going ahead of conference leading St Lawrence.</p>
<p>The second thing that strikes me is that the Atlantic Region might not get a Pool C bid, if Richard Stockton gets the Pool A.  Montclair State and Willy Pat lost semifinal matches in the NJAC last night.</p>
<p>Carnegie Mellon goes to Rochester on Saturday.  I think that this is a must-win game for both teams at the Palestra.  CMU can consolidate their Pool C chance.  In fact, this game may be for the last UAA Pool C bid, itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.d3blogs.com/d3hoops/2009/02/25/final-public-ncaa-regional-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-4700</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://d3blogs.com/d3hoops/?p=645#comment-4700</guid>
		<description>Wish I could help, but on a plane, sorry. Land near 8:30 ET.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wish I could help, but on a plane, sorry. Land near 8:30 ET.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PointSpecial</title>
		<link>http://www.d3blogs.com/d3hoops/2009/02/25/final-public-ncaa-regional-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-4699</link>
		<dc:creator>PointSpecial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://d3blogs.com/d3hoops/?p=645#comment-4699</guid>
		<description>Whoops... I didn&#039;t look at it close enough... I thouhht there was no #4...  ignore that last post...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops&#8230; I didn&#8217;t look at it close enough&#8230; I thouhht there was no #4&#8230;  ignore that last post&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.d3blogs.com/d3hoops/2009/02/25/final-public-ncaa-regional-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-4698</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://d3blogs.com/d3hoops/?p=645#comment-4698</guid>
		<description>The women came out about 7pm EST last week.  We may need to wait that long this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The women came out about 7pm EST last week.  We may need to wait that long this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PointSpecial</title>
		<link>http://www.d3blogs.com/d3hoops/2009/02/25/final-public-ncaa-regional-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-4697</link>
		<dc:creator>PointSpecial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://d3blogs.com/d3hoops/?p=645#comment-4697</guid>
		<description>I think CMU is just tied for third.  They&#039;re not tied with anyone else... but they&#039;re tied nonetheless... thus no #4!

If this is the biggest (only?) gaff from the NCAA this year, I&#039;ll take it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think CMU is just tied for third.  They&#8217;re not tied with anyone else&#8230; but they&#8217;re tied nonetheless&#8230; thus no #4!</p>
<p>If this is the biggest (only?) gaff from the NCAA this year, I&#8217;ll take it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

