Comments on: Theory of tournament pairing http://www.d3blogs.com/d3hoops/2005/09/12/theory-of-tournament-pairing/ The daily dish on Division III basketball Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:53:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Pat Coleman http://www.d3blogs.com/d3hoops/2005/09/12/theory-of-tournament-pairing/comment-page-1/#comment-490 Pat Coleman Tue, 20 Sep 2005 07:45:14 +0000 http://www.d3hoops.com/dailydose/?p=62#comment-490 You can do that, but you risk lowering your QoW in the process. :) You can do that, but you risk lowering your QoW in the process. :)

]]> By: dcollinge http://www.d3blogs.com/d3hoops/2005/09/12/theory-of-tournament-pairing/comment-page-1/#comment-489 dcollinge Tue, 20 Sep 2005 03:27:37 +0000 http://www.d3hoops.com/dailydose/?p=62#comment-489 Why not just invite three teams you are sure you can beat? That presupposes that you are not Hiram. :) Why not just invite three teams you are sure you can beat? That presupposes that you are not Hiram. :)

]]> By: Coach C http://www.d3blogs.com/d3hoops/2005/09/12/theory-of-tournament-pairing/comment-page-1/#comment-488 Coach C Tue, 20 Sep 2005 00:57:03 +0000 http://www.d3hoops.com/dailydose/?p=62#comment-488 I can't even figure it out after reading it. Here is what I know. I will take any win I can get on the first night of a tournament, because I have a way better shot of winning another off a positive win than off a disappointing loss. Plus, you lose on the first night, noting is saying that the team you thought was the doormat istn a lot better than you thought. I can’t even figure it out after reading it.

Here is what I know. I will take any win I can get on the first night of a tournament, because I have a way better shot of winning another off a positive win than off a disappointing loss. Plus, you lose on the first night, noting is saying that the team you thought was the doormat istn a lot better than you thought.

]]> By: "The Roop" http://www.d3blogs.com/d3hoops/2005/09/12/theory-of-tournament-pairing/comment-page-1/#comment-487 "The Roop" Fri, 16 Sep 2005 03:17:49 +0000 http://www.d3hoops.com/dailydose/?p=62#comment-487 Not sure how many coaches will read it either, but with an expanded tournament field and more "at-large" bids I think it will be something that gets consideration. Not sure how many coaches will read it either, but with an expanded tournament field and more “at-large” bids I think it will be something that gets consideration.

]]> By: sager http://www.d3blogs.com/d3hoops/2005/09/12/theory-of-tournament-pairing/comment-page-1/#comment-486 sager Thu, 15 Sep 2005 04:13:43 +0000 http://www.d3hoops.com/dailydose/?p=62#comment-486 Astute observations, Pat. But I wonder just how many coaches are actually going to: a) read this and act upon it; or b) figure it out on their own. Astute observations, Pat. But I wonder just how many coaches are actually going to: a) read this and act upon it; or b) figure it out on their own.

]]>